Rolling Stone: Blowing the Whistle on the US Department of Justice

by Sharon Noonan Kramer
On November 6, 2014, Rolling Stone published an excellent article by Matt Taibbi.  The article is titled, “The $9 Billion Witness: Meet JPMorgan Chase’s Worst Nightmare
The article’s gist is of a Canadian woman who knows how to cause those responsible for the multi-billion dollar mortgage defrauding to finally face criminal charges in the United States; and what has been done by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to keep what she knows concealed in the courts, so that no criminal prosecutions ever occur.
This expose’ really struck a chord with us.  We completely understand Mr. Taibbi’s point that the real story is not the fraud itself.  The real story is the cover-up of how insidious the fraud really is; and how those who have despicably fleeced the public continue to profit from unconscionable under the color of law acts of the DOJ, et.al., as thousands of U.S. citizens continue to suffer from the fallout.
We at Katy’s know and can prove that this is not the only instance in which bad actors at the DOJ and friends have been lying and shielding those who have committed criminal acts to fleece the United States public of billions of dollars.  People have been permanently disabled and some have died from the retalitory criminal acts to conceal what we know from coming to public light.  Not one person has been punished for the collusion to defraud by contractors of the DOJ, et.al., in ten years of lying and falsifying court documents in California, to cover-up scientific fraud in U.S. public health policies and courts all across the nation.
Rolling StoneEverything that I thought was bad at the time turned out to be a million times worse…I tried to go on with the things I was doing, but I just stopped sleeping and couldn’t eat.”  Whistleblower Alayne Fleischmann
 Six years after the crisis that cratered the global economy, it’s not exactly news that the country’s biggest banks stole on a grand scale. That’s why the more important part of Fleischmann’s story is in the pains Chase and the Justice Department took to silence her.” Matt Taibbi
Below are key excerpts of Mr. Taibbi’s excellent Rolling Stone article:
Alayne Fleischmann is the central witness in one of the biggest cases of white-collar crime in American history, possessing secrets that JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon late last year paid $9 billion…to keep the public from hearing.
In today’s America, someone like Fleischmann – an honest person caught for a little while in the wrong place at the wrong time – has to be willing to live through an epic ordeal…. And when she finally gets there, she still has to risk everything to take that last step. “The assumption they make is that I won’t blow up my life to do it,” Fleischmann says. “But they’re wrong about that.”
That’s when she decided to break her silence. “I tried to go on with the things I was doing, but I just stopped sleeping and couldn’t eat,” she says. “It felt like I was trying to keep this secret and my body was literally rejecting it.”
“Everything that I thought was bad at the time,” Fleischmann says, “turned out to be a million times worse.”
Fleischmann knew something the rest of the world did not: The criminal investigation was going nowhere.
She’s had to struggle to find work despite some striking skills and qualifications, a common symptom of a not-so-common condition called being a whistle-blower.
 
“I could be sued into bankruptcy,” she says. “I could lose my license to practice law. I could lose everything. But if we don’t start speaking up, then this really is all we’re going to get: the biggest financial cover-up in history.”
 
Back in 2006, as a deal manager at the gigantic bank, Fleischmann first witnessed, then tried to stop, what she describes as “massive criminal securities fraud” in the bank’s mortgage operations.
 “It used to be if you wrote a memo, they had to stop, because now there’s proof that they knew what they were doing,” she says. “But when the Justice Department doesn’t do anything, that stops being a deterrent. I just didn’t know that at the time.”
In February 2008, less than two years after joining the bank, Fleischmann was quietly dismissed in a round of layoffs. A few months later, proof would appear that her bosses knew all along that the boom-era mortgage market was rotten.
She was blocked at every turn: by asleep-on-the-job regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission, by a court system that allowed Chase to use its billions to bury her evidence, and, finally, by officials like outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder, the chief architect of the crazily elaborate government policy of surrender, secrecy and cover-up.
Fleischmann later realized that the government wasn’t interested in having her testify against Chase in court or any other public forum. Instead, the Justice Department’s political wing, led by Holder, appeared to be using her, and her evidence, as a bargaining chip to extract more hush money from Dimon. It worked. Within weeks, Dimon had upped his offer to roughly $9 billion.
The newspapers and the Justice Department described the deal as a “$13 billion settlement,” hailing it as the biggest white-collar regulatory settlement in American history. The deal released Chase from civil liability. And, in what was described by The New York Times as a “major victory for the government,” it left open the possibility that the Justice Department could pursue a further criminal investigation against the bank. But the idea that Holder had cracked down on Chase was a carefully contrived fiction, one that has survived to this day.
“They typically charge only one offense when there are dozens. It would be like charging a serial murderer with a single assault and giving them probation,” says Dennis Kelleher of the financial reform group Better Markets.
Instead of a detailed complaint naming names, Chase was allowed to sign a flimsy, 10-and-a-half-page “statement of facts” that was: (a) so short, a first-year law student could read it in the time it takes to eat a tuna sandwich, and (b) so vague, a halfway intelligent person could read it and not know anyone had done anything wrong. The ink was barely dry on the deal before Chase would have the balls to insinuate its innocence.
Chase was allowed to treat some $7 billion of the settlement as a tax write-off. Couple this with the fact that the bank’s share price soared six percent on news of the settlement, adding more than $12 billion in value to shareholders, and one could argue Chase actually made money from the deal. What’s more, to defray the cost of this and other fines, Chase last year laid off 7,500 lower-level employees. The board awarded a 74 percent raise to the man who oversaw the biggest regulatory penalty ever, upping his compensation package to about $20 million.
In September, at a speech at NYU, Holder defended the lack of prosecutions of top executives on the grounds that, in the corporate context, sometimes bad things just happen without actual people being responsible. “Responsibility remains so diffuse, and top executives so insulated,” Holder said, “that any misconduct could again be considered more a symptom of the institution’s culture than a result of the willful actions of any single individual.”
In other words, people don’t commit crimes, corporate culture commits crimes! It’s probably fortunate that Holder is quitting before he has time to apply the same logic to Mafia or terrorism cases.
Or, as Fleischmann translates it, [Holder said], “I will personally stay on to make sure that no one can undo the cover-up that I’ve accomplished.” Despite it all, Fleischmann still had faith that the Justice Department or some other federal agency would make things right. “I guess I was just a trusting person,” she says. “I wasn’t cynical. I kept hoping.”
Because after all this activity, all these court actions, all these penalties (both real and abortive), even after a fair amount of noise in the press, the target companies remain more ascendant than ever. The people who stole all those billions are still in place. And the bank is more untouchable than ever – former Debevoise & Plimpton hotshots Mary Jo White and Andrew Ceresny, who represented Chase for some of this case, have since been named to the two top jobs at the SEC. As for the bank itself, its stock price has gone up since the settlement and flirts weekly with five-year highs.
Holder or whoever succeeds him can still make the whole thing disappear by negotiating a soft landing for the company. “That’s the thing I’m worried about,”  says Fleischmann. “That they make the whole thing disappear. If they do that, the truth will never come out.”
Truth is one thing, and if the right people fight hard enough, you might get to hear it from time to time.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-9-billion-witness-20141106#ixzz3IlIrWskJ

 

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Campaign For Judicial Integrity impact on California judicial elections

I received the below message from Dr. Richard Fine, Chairman of Campaign For Judicial Integrity (CFJI).  Dr. Fine analyzed the percentages of “No” votes for retention of California justices, by county.  According to the calculations, the percentage of people who voted “No” jumped significantly from the last election cycle.
CFJI is gearing up to do even better in the next cycle; with four years to get the word out of why it is important to remove the stale old guard from California’s broken judicial branch. To all of you who voted “No” and helped to spread the word, Thank You!
Sharon Noonan Kramer
Begin forwarded message:
“Dear Sharon:
We made an impact on the November 4 election! A big thank you for all you have done and to all those who received and shared our messages. Keep up the fight. We will eradicate judicial corruption! Please post and share the following message with everyone.
Regards, Richard
Vote ‘No’ to Justices Campaign Impacted California’s November 4 Judicial Elections
The November 4 percentage of ‘No’ votes to Supreme Court justices may be the highest percentage since three California Supreme Court justices were voted out in 1982 for refusing to enforce the death penalty. The state wide per cent range of “No” votes rose from 20-24% in 2002 and 2006 to 33.3% in 2014. The rising trend of ‘No’ votes indicated that the justices can be Voted Out at the next election.
On a county by county basis the effect of the vote ‘No’ campaign was more dramatic. Only five of California’s fifty eight counties accounted for over 50% of the statewide ‘Yes’ votes. The five counties were Alameda, Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego and Santa Clara. Only another eleven counties exceeded the statewide ‘Yes’ vote percentage. These eleven counties were Alpine, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Ventura and Yolo.
The remaining forty counties each had ‘No’ vote percentages in the mid 30% to high 40% range. Most striking, seven counties voted ‘No’ to Justice Cuellar. These were: Glen, Lassen, Mariposa, Modoc, Shasta, Sierra and Tehama. Five counties voted “No” to Justice Liu. These were: Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Sierra and Tehama.
Also striking, on November 4, 1.67 million less people voted in the judicial election than voted for governor. This refusal to vote may have indicated disgust with the judiciary and judicial corruption. Had these voters, voted “No”, all the Supreme Court justices would have been Voted Out.
The 2014 dramatic increase in the percentage of ‘No’ votes demonstrated the impact of the vote ‘No’ campaign. The Judiciary, Governor, Legislature and county supervisors making illegal payments to judges are on notice that we will end judicial corruption.
The Campaign for Judicial Integrity is a national grassroots movement and organization dedicated to the eradication of judicial corruption in all of its forms. Contact: Richard I. Fine, Ph.D.
Tel: (310) 622-6900; E-mail: richardfine@campaignforjudicialintegrity.org
Links:
http://www.campaignforjudicialintegrity.org
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment

Treat Californians to No More Tricks. Vote “NO” Re-election of All the State’s Justices

From ghosties and ghoulies and long-winded beasties and things that go bump in the courts, oh California voters, please protect us!
In four days, on November 4th, Californians will go to the voting booths. They’ll vote on many issues and elections/re-elections to public office.  No votes are more important than how voters vote on the state’s Supreme and Appellate Court justices. This is because if courts are wickedly compromised, then all the elected public officials in the world cannot insure that the laws approved by the voters are upheld.
There are forty-five California justices who are on this year’s ballot and are subject to voter retention or ousting.  This is nearly half of all California justices currently on the bench. Your vote to remove all who are balloted will send the message that court corruption will no longer be tolerated by the public.
Recent history of some great Jack-o-Laterns
The past two weeks alone have shed much light on many areas which spell out how California courts have been jacking-around with justice and the Constitution. The following groups and individuals have served as Jack-o-Laterns, helping to illuminate the massive California court frauds and harm to the public that they cause:
October 25th, Judicial Council Watcher (JCW) made note of its fourth anniversary of exposing long-winded beasties at the helm of the California courts. The website is frequently contributed to by court employees, including judges and staff/ex-staff of the Admin Offices of the Courts. It provides eye-popping and spell-binding evidence of a vast cauldron of lies that have been conjured up by Cal court leaders over the years. If you’ve never visited their blog, you really should before you cast your vote to retain/oust California’s justices.
October 27th, Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) was granted an audience with the Judicial Council. Approximately sixty people traveled to San Francisco “from Placer county to San Diego county” for the two day Judicial Council meeting. Many shared their true stories of how justice has become a ghost of the past in California, as their families have been ghoulishly shredded by unethical and unlawful acts in the courts. (I was there. I think I saw a wicked witch from the west appear at the end of the meeting. She was offering for Judicial Council members to bite into her poison apple in the hopes that they would stay fast asleep at the wheel – and not grant CJE’s request for future public hearings.)
October 27th, Barbara Kaufman, Esq., presented evidence to the Judicial Council that the CEO of the Marin Superior Court has recently concealed court document falsifications; and that California’s Governor and Attorney General have stated in writing that the Judicial Council has the duty to stop the fraud upon the court. Seems clerks have been ordered to back-date legal documents and electronic records in an effort for a judge to feign that her Marin county court has subject matter jurisdiction – where none any longer exists. Any orders she issues from here on out are fraudulent and void – and a grim reminder of how justice is really for “just us” in the California courts.
October 24th, Divorce Corp and the Family Law Report released their 2nd part of a two-part interview with Dr. Richard Fine of the Campaign for Judicial Integrity (CFJI). The interviews are of how former federal prosecutor, Dr. Fine, attempted to slay a dragon of court corruption; only to be locked away in a Los Angeles dungeon for well over fifteen fortnights by the conjuring of a black robed cat — who was taking bribes from LA county. It is proven that this cat and others have been milking the system and have been aided to continue by court leadership. Everyone knows the practice is illegal and sets the court officers up for bias in their rulings adverse to the public’s best interest. It continues dispite California justices knowledgement that the payments are illegal.
October 19th, Full Disclosure Network (FDN) announced that a Federal court has intervened to determine that the Los Angeles Superior Court should reconsider allowing the filming in their courthouse of the documentary “The Cost of Courage”. A 6 minute Video Report  was released by FDN on October 19th featuring Paul Orfanedes, Judicial Watch Director of Litigation, who describes the recent developments in the case  Dutton v. Wesley, Case No. 12-01888-R-JC (C.D. Cal.).  The video covers the “Reverse and Remand” Order issued by US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel that held the US California Central District Judge Manuel Real, shall re-consider the case regarding LA Superior Court’s refusal to issue a permit to the Full Disclosure Network (FDN) for use of an empty court room in Department 86, to record the final scene for their documentary.  According to their website, “The FDN documentary involves the controversial case covering the incarceration of former U. S. Prosecutor Richard I. Fine who was held in “solitary, coercive confinement” for 18 months in L.A. County Central Men’s Jail.  Department 86 was the Court Room where Judge David Yafee ordered Fine taken into custody and held indefinitely without a hearing.”
October 23rd California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) filed their appeal in the Federal RICO case against San Diego Superior Court judges et.al. The gist of this matter is that compromised judges and their ghastly friends have abused their power to retaliate against CCFC members for their refusal of silence of the courts’ continued usage of uncredited family court evaluators. Seems they’ve been brewing up ways for years for the courts to make more money by causing divorces to be drawn-out and expensive for families. Oddly, just months ago, a federal judge deemed that CCFC’s RICO case was not frivolous or meant to harass; and at the same time dismissed the case because she claimed she couldn’t understand it.  This begs the question: How does one determine that a case is not without merit if they can’t understand it and thus need to throw it out?
October 28th, Ronald Pierce, a California citizen from Tulare County, filed a motion in the California Supreme Court for them to give him his life back.  The man requires extraordinary relief for this to happen. In 2008, Mr. Pierce filed for divorce from a woman he no longer wished to be wed to.   In 2009 via some slick lawyering aided by the courts and the divorce industry; he was deemed a batterer by the courts with no evidence presented that he ever once hit his wife. (She actually stated that he never did. I’ve reviewed the court documents in detail). Six years later, there is still no property settlement; there is second restraining order against Mr. Pierce (basically for posting of the court corruption on Facebook); and he still has no home for his children to come visit him. While trying to untangle the web of deceit, he was deemed a “vexatious litigant” on appellate court justices own motion. Mr. Pierce, who used to work for the county, is currently homeless, penniless and disabled from the years of abuse and mental torture by multiple officers of the California broken branch. By slick trick, Mrs. Pierce’s new husband is being treated to living in the property that Mr. Pierce still owns, yet cannot even set foot on. Mr. Pierce is justifiably concerned that he will soon be held in contempt of court and will be residing in jail for filing a motion in the California Supreme Court. This is because those who have been deemed vexatious are not allowed to file motions without the court’s permission or by the posting of $25,000.00 – which Mr. Pierce no longer has — thanks to the perverse and pervasive corruption in the California courts.
Could a “NO” Vote for ALL California Justices Save the Judicial Branch? Seems it could!CAMPAIGNFORJUDICIALINTEGRITYblowupofsixflyers-page-001
From ghosties and ghoulies and long-winded beasties and things that go bump in the courts, oh California voters, please protect us!
Have a Happy & Safe Halloween!
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer — whistleblower of scientific fraud in U.S. public health policy over the Toxic Mold issue that has been aided to continue by mass corruption in the California courts.
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment

Wash Po on Chronic Fatigue, Mold & Politics…White Coat, White Collar & Black Robe Crime!

“The role of mold in CFS [Chronic Fatigue Syndrome] has received nearly no scientific study, just like many other promising areas of research in the illness… My recovery has almost certainly come through physiological changes in response to my avoiding mold.Julie Rehmeyer, science author.
October 6, 2014, Washington Post  What is chronic fatigue syndrome, and why aren’t we doing more to treat the illness? by Julie RehmeyerCrying Justice
“HHS’s [United States Department of Health and Human Science] handling of the latest controversy has only intensified skepticism. The majority of committee members chosen to develop the new definition have no professional experience with the disease, says Derek Enlander, a CFS specialist at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. As he put it, ‘Do you want a podiatrist to treat your grandfather with lung cancer?
…..These disputes are heartbreaking when the needs of CFS patients are so great. Even the high-quality treatment I got from Klimas helped me only slightly. A year after I saw her, I heard from some patients who had significantly recovered from CFS through assiduously avoiding exposure to mold and other environmental contaminants.[1] Although I considered the theory wacky, I was desperate enough to experiment. And for me, it worked. Two years later, I can go running, write articles and travel with my new husband. Every time I do, it feels like a miracle…Yes, we need a sound, accepted definition, but we also need so much more. It’s time to treat patients with respect, to move beyond political squabbling and to make an investment in researching this illness that is in proportion to the devastation it causes.
[1]  “Back from the Edge: How One Man’s Discovery Brought Him From Desperately Sick with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome To the Top of Mt. Whitney in Six Months by Dr. Lisa Petrison

_________

January 9, 2007 Wall Street Journal, Court of Opinion, Amid Suits Over Mold Experts Wear Two Hats; Authors of Science Paper Often Cited by Defense Also Help in Litigation  by David Armstrong
“The paper [American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) “Adverse Human Health Effects from Exposure to Mold“] has become a key defense tool wielded by builders, landlords and insurers in litigation. It has also been used to assuage fears of parents following discovery of mold in schools. One point that rarely emerges in these cases: The paper was written by people who regularly are paid experts for the defense side in mold litigation. The ACOEM [American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine] doesn’t disclose this, nor did its paper.
The professional society’s president, Tee Guidotti, says no disclosure is needed because the paper represents the consensus of its membership and is a statement from the society, not the individual authors. The dual roles show how conflicts of interest can color debate on emerging health issues and influence litigation related to it…Building groups and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have cited it to rebut the notion that mold in the home can be toxic….
The paper’s authors [Bruce Kelman & Brian Hardin of VeriTox, Inc] say their conclusions are validated by the Institute of Medicine’s paper. But the author of the Institute paper’s mold toxicity chapter, Harriett Ammann, disagrees, and criticizes the ACOEM paper’s methodology: ‘They took hypothetical exposure and hypothetical toxicity and jumped to the conclusion there is nothing there.’

____________

October 2007, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, excerpt STATEMENT ON MOLD from “ACOEM, A Professional Organization in Service to Industry” by Sharon Noonan Kramer
The ACOEM Statement on Mold was introduced in 2002 as an evidence-based statement and published in JOEM [Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine] The policy statement by ACOEM is that mold exposure in an indoor environment could not plausibly reach a level of exposure to cause toxic health effects…
In the spring of 2003, Veritox, a risk-management company that provides defense testimony in mold litigation, and of which two of the authors of the JOEM article are principals, was paid $40,000 by the Manhattan Institute to convert the ACOEM Statement on Mold into a “lay translation” to be shared through the United States Chamber of Commerce with stakeholder industries—real estate, mortgage, construction, and insurance.
The authors unfairly presented the essence of the mold controversy as,“Thus the notion that ‘toxic mold’ is an insidious secret ‘killer’ as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim is ‘junk science’ unsupported by actual scientific study.”
The authors and many other ACOEM members have cited the JOEM paper and the ACOEM Statement on Mold before the courts in an effort to deny illness claims when testifying as experts on behalf of those with financial stakes in the building and finance industries. Although the defense testimony has been deemed to be an unscientific nonsequitur by the Institute of Medicine and by the courts, ACOEM continues to deny that there is any basis in fact to dispute its position statement.”

_____________

(2002 to present) The CRIMINAL BACK STORY  INVOLVING CALIFORNIA JUDGES & JUSTICES; U.S. LEGISLATORS; the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
522945_500542959989756_964167932_a

Sharon Noonan Kramer

I, Sharon Kramer have a bachelors in marketing.  In 2005, I wrote of how the U.S. Chamber was involved with Veritox, Inc., ACOEM, U.S. Congressman Gary Miller (R-Ca), and the Manhattan Institute think-tank to mass market the fraudulent concept that it was proven mold toxins in water damaged buildings (WDB) could never reach a level to harm.  Kelman & Hardin of Veritox, Inc., were paid to pen the scientific fraud for the U.S. Chamber as they forged the name of Andrew Saxon, MD, of UCLA as their co-author. By having the UC name on the fraud, it lent undue credibility in the eyes of many courts and America’s physicians.
For my efforts to expose a massive public fleecing, I was framed for libel with the aid of several leading California jurists for my 2005 writing. They collusively worked with Veritox and their attorney, Keith Scheuer, to make it appear that I was a liar and had lied about the conspiracy to defraud the public with scientific fraud. Multiple material court documents were falisfied by jurists and clerks of the court rendering them legally void to be used for any purpose — including trying to shut me up under the color of law.
In 2010, Veritox, Inc. and Scheuer filed a second lawsuit against me, in which the void on its face judgment from the first case was the sole foundational document. They were trying to scare me into silence of multiple California judges’ and justices’ criminal roles in aiding Veritox et.al.’s  scientific fraud to continue in policy and courts nationwide.In 2012, I was jailed in San Diego, California for refusing to be coerced to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel, which would have aided to cover up the fraud upon the court if I had signed a false confession. I was given a false criminal FBI record — by a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction and the San Diego County Sheriff Department.  Multiple times, the San Diego County District Attorney has refused to intercede to stop the massive crime, the continuing public fleecing and the retailation all under the facade of law.
Veritox sometimes serves as toxic tort defense witnesses in federal cases.  They are hired by attorneys of the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ).  Often times, even when they are not the defense experts, their scientific fraud is cited as an authoratative source that it is proven mold toxins do not harm; thereby aiding to stop liability for causation of illness, disablity and death — including among the families of our military men and women who give their lives to protect our families from criminals and enemies both foreign and domestic.
To date, the California jurists who committed the multiple acts of falsifying court documents to aid the scientific fraud of Veritox to continue to harm the lives of thousands; still refuse to recall, rescind and vacate the undeniably falsified court documents in Veritox’s cases against me.  As I January 2013, I was threatened via a coram non judice fraud upon the court order, that should I pursue any legal action in the California state courts to stop the massive fraud, I will be deemed a vexatious litigant — even though I have never initiated litigation in my entire fifty-nine years of  life.
As such, I am in the process of filing a federal RICO lawsuit in a effort to stop the massive public fleecing by federal contractors et.al., and to remove some very big bad apples from California’s judicial branch.  I am also speaking out, along with many other California citizens, about the criminal practice of court document falsifications being systematically concealed in the California judicial branch time and time again; and the retaliation people experience when they refuse silence of the fraud upon the court and extensive damages it causes.
In my own matter, when (not if)  it is acknowledged that officers of the California courts and their clerks falsified court documents while trying to silence, intimidate, discredit and ruin me for exposing government aided fraud; the scientific fraud of Veritox will immediately cease to be in public health policies, workmans compensation policies, and United States courts — by the acknowledgment that they are nothing more than well connected criminals and phoney, con artist pseudo-scientists.
Of worthy mention, Veritox owner, Bryan Hardin, is a retired Deputy Director of the HHS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. (HHS CDC NIOSH). Veritox owner, Bruce Kelman, is a long-time Big Tobacco expert defense witness.

_________

October 2014  My planned statement before the California Judicial Council on October 27th or 28th:
“My name is Sharon Noonan Kramer.   I reside in Escondido, California.   I have a degree in marketing. I am a medical journal published author. The subject of my publications is: the scientific fraud that it has been proven toxic mold in buildings could never reach a level to harm, disable or kill; and how the fraud was mass marketed into United States public health and California workers compensation policies for the purpose of misleading US and California courts to deny liability for causation.
In my now decade of travel through the California legal system, it has come to my attention many times that jurists and clerks sometimes falsify court documents and electronic records. This act is legally defined as fraud upon the court. It, and concealment of the falsifications, are defined as felonies under California Penal Code 134.[1]   When left unaddressed, the felonious acts can have devastating impact on not only the harmed litigant, but the public and the defrauded judicial system as a whole.
As such, I join the Center for Judicial Excellence; Barbara Kaufman, Esq; California Governor Edmund G. Brown; and California Attorney General Kamala Harris; in the understanding that the Judicial Council has the ultimate duty to end the practice of falsified court document concealment, in collusive fraud upon the California courts.
Toward that end and in lawful accordance with California Government Code §77001.5[2], I respectfully request the following:
1.  the Judicial Council promptly establish a committee to hold noticed public hearings whereby citizens may share the direct evidence of falsified court documents/fraud upon the court with the committee members; and
2. the proven falsified court documents then be provided by the Judicial Council to the state legislature and the California Attorney General; and
3. the Judicial Council set clear policy by which:
a.) court employees — including judges, justices, clerks and administrators — who participate in fraud upon the  court, are reported by the Judicial Council to the California Attorney General for punishment of the criminal acts; and
b.) damages caused by concealment of falsified court documents are mitigated.
On behalf of the citizens of California and all the United States, I thank you for your prompt attention to this gravely serious matter.”CJE_10-24-14-judicial-council-statement-page-001Read CJE’s Statement of Public Concern in its entirety HERE.

Posted in Civil Justice, Health - Medical - Science, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Part II Sorge Interview of Fine Re: Massive California Court Corruption

Dear All,
Linked below is a disturbing video interview of a friend of mine, Dr. Richard Fine from Beverly Hills.  The interviewer, Joe Sorge, is sometimes a guest on CNN and Fox.
To make a long story short, if you are a California voter, on November 4th check “NO” next to the name of any and all California justices on your ballot.  Because of the way election cycles run, there currently is a real opportunity to remove nearly half of the conflicted souls from judicial office.  Forty-five out of one-hundred-eleven CA justices are subject to an up or down vote on Nov 4th.
Rampant abuse of judicial power does not occur in a judicial system w/o reviewing courts — meaning voter retained appellate & supreme court justices — covering it up while aiding it to continue.
Watch this video interview! Its an amazing true tale proving just how far down the rabbit hatch that the California courts have traveled!  They locked a man up in solitary for eighteen months – without even being charged with a crime — in retaliation for his exposing their defrauding of the public. If it could happen to him, it could happen to you!
Part 2 Joseph Sorge interview of Richard Fine, PhD & Esq.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVDcm8WtOk8&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=Mailing+Lists&utm_campaign=a58abe1e25-Family_Law_Report_Richard+Fine_Pt+2_10_24_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5b1488f8f-a58abe1e25-165843637
Make it stop!  On your ballot, just vote “NO!” to end corruption in the California courts!  Below CAMPAIGNFORJUDICIALINTEGRITYFLYERS in mini-form to easily print and share with others.
CAMPAIGNFORJUDICIALINTEGRITYblowupofsixflyers-page-001
Thank you for your help,
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer — Whistleblower of scientific fraud in US public health policy over the Toxic Mold Issue. Framed for libel by leading justices of the Cal courts. Jailed by order of a judge whose court had no jurisdiction for my refusal to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel — and given a false criminal FBI record w/o ever even being charged with a crime.  I will not be shutting up anytime soon.  People are dying from systemic fraud upon the court.
P.S. My planned statement before the California Judicial Council on October 27th or 28th:
     “My name is Sharon Noonan Kramer.   I reside in Escondido, California.   I have a degree in marketing. I am a medical journal published author. The subject of my publications is: the scientific fraud that it has been proven toxic mold in buildings could never reach a level to harm, disable or kill; and how the fraud was mass marketed into United States public health and California workers compensation policies for the purpose of misleading US and California courts to deny liability for causation.
     In my now decade of travel through the California legal system, it has come to my attention many times that jurists and clerks sometimes falsify court documents and electronic records. This act is legally defined as fraud upon the court. It, and concealment of the falsifications, are defined as felonies under California Penal Code 134.[1]   When left unaddressed, the felonious acts can have devastating impact on not only the harmed litigant, but the public and the defrauded judicial system as a whole.
     As such, I join the Center for Judicial Excellence; Barbara Kaufman, Esq; California Governor Edmund G. Brown; and California Attorney General Kamala Harris; in the understanding that the Judicial Council has the ultimate duty to end the practice of falsified court document concealment, in collusive fraud upon the California courts.
     Toward that end and in lawful accordance with California Government Code §77001.5[2], I respectfully request the following:
1.  the Judicial Council promptly establish a committee to hold noticed public hearings whereby citizens may share the direct evidence of falsified court documents/fraud upon the court with the committee members; and
2. the proven falsified court documents then be provided by the Judicial Council to the state legislature and the California Attorney General; and
3. the Judicial Council set clear policy by which:
a.) court employees — including judges, justices, clerks and administrators — who participate in fraud upon the  court, are reported by the Judicial Council to the California Attorney General for punishment of the criminal acts; and
 b.) damages caused by concealment of falsified court documents are mitigated.
     On behalf of the citizens of California and all the United States, I thank you for your prompt attention to this gravely serious matter.”
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment