- katy on So Cal U.S. Attorney Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts
- Kimberly Kimball on So Cal U.S. Attorney Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts
- Dina Padilla on So Cal U.S. Attorney Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts
- Valerie Madeska on Notice to a Workcomp Defense Attorney to Cease Using Science Fraud in Mold Cases
- katy on Notice to a Workcomp Defense Attorney to Cease Using Science Fraud in Mold Cases
- Dina Padilla on Notice to a Workcomp Defense Attorney to Cease Using Science Fraud in Mold Cases
- Dina Padilla on Bill Cosby, Justice Judith McConnell & Defamation by Seriel Predators
- Dina Padilla on USA Today ~ USDOJ claims crack-down on corporate fraudsters. REALLY? I don’t think so!!!
- Dina Padilla on USA Today ~ USDOJ claims crack-down on corporate fraudsters. REALLY? I don’t think so!!!
- sharonkramer on EMSL lab director acknowledges EPA investigation; offers free repeat ERMI
- Dina Padilla on Say WHAT??? Consumer Reports recommends bleach for mold because….
- katy on Say WHAT??? Consumer Reports recommends bleach for mold because….
- Shop at “AmazonSmile” to help stop LYME DISEASE
- Jury Finds “Toxic Mold” Harmed Oregon Family, Builder’s Arbitration Clause Not Binding
- CA SB 655 Just another gov’t backed insurer scam over the mold issue
- So Cal U.S. Attorney Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts
- Justice Judith McConnell grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon your court.
- HuffPo Publishes Insurer Fraud Over the Toxic Mold Issue, Nov 4, 2015
- Notice to a Workcomp Defense Attorney to Cease Using Science Fraud in Mold Cases
OSHA Issue Bldg Maintenance Advisory, Spring 2011, Cites Katy’s
- Single mom to five forced out of apartment because of mold - Fox 2 Detroit November 4, 2015
- Luxury apartment renters upset with leaks, fees - KVUE November 13, 2015
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Fibromyalgia Linked to Deficiencies in RBC Magnesium, IGF-1 October 5, 2015
- The Health Care Industry Finally Recognizes Fibromyalgia October 5, 2015
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
The case (Haynes vs. Adair Homes Inc.) is a first in the Northwest to award personal injury damages to a family exposed to toxic mold in a newly built home. “This verdict is significant because it holds construction companies responsible when they negligently build sickbuildings,” said Kelly Vance, the family’s attorney.
(PRWEB) March 9, 2005 — A Clackamas County jury on Friday (March 4, 2005) held Adair Homes Inc. responsible for faulty construction practices that caused toxic mold to thrive inside Paul and Renee Haynes’ new home in Sandy, Oregon. The jury also found Adair’s negligence caused illness in Mrs. Haynes and the couple’s two small children – Michael, 6, and Liam, 4. The family experienced severe respiratory, digestive and cognitive impairment. One half of a million dollars was awarded to the injured family.
The case is a first in the Northwest to award damages for personal injury to a family exposed to mold in a newly built home. “This verdict is significant because it holds construction companies responsible when they negligently build sick buildings,” said Kelly Vance, the family’s attorney.
Adair Homes, Inc. which builds hundreds of residences each year in Oregon, Washington and Idaho, built the house on the Haynes’ five acres in early 2002. Four months after moving in and becoming ill, the family discovered rampant mold growth inside the walls of their new home. Dry wall and insulation were installed while the frame was wet from recent heavy rains. Evidence presented during the trial proved there was standing water in the wall cavities and the crawl space long after the construction was completed. This led to the growth of the toxigenic fungi. “You couldn’t have made the framing in that house more wet if you had sprayed it with a firehose,” stated Vance.
By the time the Haynes discovered the mold, it was too late. Mrs. Haynes and the children were exhibiting neurologic and immune system damage. Paul Haynes reported the problem to Adair Homes, but the company refused to take responsibility. The family was forced to flee their new house in an effort to save the health of the mother and young sons.
Two separate medical evaluations substantiated that both Renee Haynes and her son, Michael, had mold antibodies in their blood, indicative of dangerous exposure levels to mold. Numerous experts, including a fungal immunologist, an occupational therapist and a neuropsychologist testified concerning the Haynes children’s developmental and sensory integration disorders that began shortly after moving into the Adair built home. The family’s treating physicians and therapists agreed that Liam’s and Michael’s medical needs from the mold exposure will continue for several years to come. Michael’s teacher testified that he was placed in a special disabled room at school and may need to remain there until at least junior high school. She expects Liam to suffer the same fate.
Amazingly, the Haynes family almost did not even get to tell their story to a jury. Adair, like many other commercial entities, utilizes an arbitration clause in its contract. That clause designates a specific preferred arbitration service. Adair uses Construction Arbitration Services, Inc., a company based far away from Adair’s market, in Dallas, Texas.
After the case was filed, Adair moved to stay the case pending arbitration and submitted an affidavit from the owner of the arbitration service, Marshall Lippman. The judge allowed the case to go to trial when the family’s attorney showed that Lippman had submitted a false affidavit concealing the fact that he had been disbarred by the State of New York and Washington D.C. The disbarments occurred because Lippman had been found to have stolen funds from his clients.
[Things that make you go “hmmmm?” In 2006, the Haynes’ attorney, Calvin “Kelly” Vance pleaded no contest for “violating DR 2-106(A) (collecting a clearly excessive fee), DR 2-110(A)(3) (failing to promptly refund unearned fees) and DR 9-101(A) (failing to deposit client funds into trust).”]
Dr. Bruce Kelman of GlobalTox, Inc., [now Veritox, Inc.] a Washington based environmental risk management company, testified as an expert witness for the defense, as he does in mold cases throughout the country. Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand. He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure. Although much medical research finds otherwise, the controversial piece claims that it is not plausible the types of illnesses experienced by the Haynes family and reported by thousands from across the US, could be caused by “toxic mold” exposure in homes, schools or office buildings.
In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries ‘associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. [ACOEM]
Sharon Noonan Kramer
Advocate for Integrity in Health Marketing in Policy & Ethics in the Courts
The above is my 2005 writing, the first to publicly expose how the false concept was mass-marketed into US public health policies that it was proven “Toxic Mold” in water damaged buildings could never reach a level to harm.
In a SLAPP suit brought by Bruce Kelman and Veritox, officers of the California courts committed fraud upon their courts and systematically framed me for libel for the words “altered his under oath statements” in this accurate writing to aid the insurer fraud scam to continue.
I currently have a void permanent injunction issued from a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction, never to republish a sentence that is not even in this writing. This is because all of the above sentences are undeniably 100% accurate and the California jurists know it and know what they’ve done to aid mass discrimination of the environmentally disabled. They want me to stop writing of their cronyism to cover-up for each others’ misdeeds on behalf of the insurance industry that is deadly to the environmentally disabled. (and all the blind-eyed-public-servants who aid it to continue.)
As a result of the systemic corruption in the San Diego courts while case-fixing to aid and abet fraud in policy and courts all across the U.S.; ten years later after this writing was first published, people are still being disabled and discriminated against by the false concept that it’s proven “Toxic Mold” does not harm.  
 November 12, 2015 letter to Justice Judith McConnell, Presiding Justice of the California Fourth District Division One Court of Appeal: Justice Judith McConnell grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon your court.
 November 12, 2015 letter to So Cal U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy: So Cal U.S. Attorney Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts
In its current form, California Senate Bill 655 is a scam. It is discrimination against those being environmentally disabled by exposure to biocontaminants in water damaged buildings (wdb) and more of the same ole, same ole — gov’t backed insurer fraud (this time, one endorsed into law in October 2015 by Governor Jerry Brown).
It will cause more environmental disability, discrimination and death by unchecked negligence of landords, employers, property managers, builders, school districts, property sellers; and cause more bad faith acts by workcomp insurers, property-casualty insurers, errors and omissions insurers and health insurers. It will cause more litigation — not less.
Here’s how this latest scam works and is mass-marketed by the joined unclean hands of many — both in and out of government.
1. According to CA Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), sponsor of SB 655 in her advertisement of Governor Brown’s endorsement of SB 655, “Newly signed mold bill protects both landlords and tenants” October 14, 2015:
“No more air tests that tenants and their attorneys attempt to use to delay evictions and avoid the payment of rent.”
[This is deadly. Many times landlords — some of whom are not being informed of the danger — cover up a mold problem by painting over it. As a result, it can only be determinied to be adversely impacting air quality and safety by testing. Since when are people in California forbidden to determine if their living environment is hazardous to their health?]
“The mold must be determined by a health officer or code enforcement officer to rise to a level that endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety or welfare of the public or the occupants. No more last minute tenant self-declarations that the mold exists.”
[There is no such animal as an established threshold or permissable exposure level (PEL) before mold and accompanying biocontaminants in wdb cause illness. If someone is exhibiting symptoms of Chronic Inflammatory Response with probablity it is being caused by a wdb (CIRS-WDB) the underlying problem needs to be found and mitigated]
“The California Apartment Association worked with Sen. Mitchell to add these protections to the law.”
[the “nonprofit” CAA and their political action committee CAAPAC lobby heavily and contribute to politicians’ campaigns on behalf of the financial interests of landlords, property managers and their insurers]
2. No help will be coming for those disabled by the negligence of others from the “health officers” of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This California state agency is still mass-marketing a debunked and deadly linear-no-threshold (LNT) model, the “Veritox Theory“. The greatly flawed risk assessment model (which claims to prove mictrobial toxins in wdb can never reach a level to harm) was first fraudulently promoted as legitimate science by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) in 2002.
In 2005, Governor & University of California Regents’ President, Arnold Schwarzenegger, endorsed the insurer fraud scam into California public health and work related policy. From the CDPH website, “Mold in Indoor WorkPlaces” (see page 4)
“Physicians can refer to the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) statement, Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment.”
“Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor State of California; Kimberly Belshé, Secretary Health and Human Services Agency; Sandra Shewry, Director Department of Health Services; John Rea, Acting Director Department of Industrial Relations”
3. The ACOEM Mold Statement “Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment” was authored by Bruce Kelman (old tobacco scientist), Brian Hardin (retired deputy director of CDC NIOSH and co-owner of Veritox, Inc. with Mr. Kelman) and Andrew Saxon of UCLA. All three men are prolific expert defense witnesses in toxic torts. Their paper, which was promoted to be the scientific understanding of all ACOEM physicians, was sunset by ACOEM in February of 2015.
Even though the California Department of Public Health continues to promote the scientific fraud of ACOEM, the occupational physician “nonprofit” trade association of ACOEM itself is no longer promoting it.
As quoted from the March 9, 2015 WorkCompCentral announcing of the scientific/insurer fraud’s retirement from policy: “ACOEM Takes Down Position Paper commonly Used to Defend Against Mold Claims”
[Sharon] Kramer said the sunsetting that appears to have occurred takes away any weight the paper might hold as a defense against workers’ compensation claims where the claimant is seeking benefits for mold-related illness…’It was a litigation defense argument right from the get-go,’ she said…. [Dr. Ritchie] Shoemaker said there are several ways to show that a patient has been exposed to the inhalation of mycotoxins, which mold produces.…’After 2003, there were no cases that I participated in where defense did not quote ACOEM,”
4. SB 655 in conjunction with the CDPH still promoting “garbage science” over the mold issue most likely explains the odd HuffPo blog by someone who has never written anything over the mold issue, Blair King, Ph.D. This recent policy under SB 655 falsely being promoted as to the benefit of both “landlord and tenants” explains the marketing need for the November 4, 2015 deceptive HuffPo article by self-proclaimed “evidence based science” blogger, Mr. King, “The Truth About Toxic Mold”
For reference is support of his Untruth about Toxic Mold, Mr. King cited a key marketing-statement from the now retired ACOEM Mold Statement without disclosing it was from the retired position statement of ACOEM.
“As for the mycotoxins, the research is also clear: Current scientific evidence does not support the proposition that human health has been adversely affected by inhaled mycotoxins in home, school, or office environments (Hardin Kelman and Saxon, 2003)”
[quoting from “Adverse Human Health Effects Associated With Molds in the Indoor Environment” while providing a link which conceals the LNT Veritox Theory foundation for the fraud in support of the false concept that it is proven mycotoxins in wdb could never reach a level to harm. See link from Europe that Mr. King chose above “Hardin Kelman and Saxon, 2003“]
5. When caught marketing the debunked risk assessement model and questioned on Twitter about Mr. King’s attempt to resurrect the dead and deadly fraudulent Veritox Theory as legitimate science, the following exchange occurred:
Question from MoldRevolution (Sandy Wolfe): ”Blair do you care to retract your article or at least correct it?”
Blair King’s Reply: “The article that says the exact thing as the CDC and CA Dept of Health? No thanks, I’m good”.
6. It’s sad, but predicable that the gov’t backed and debunked insurer fraud by misapplication of a fraudulent risk assessment model – the Veritox Theory – continues to rear its ugly head long after being widely and publicly discredited many times over.
To again quote Dr. Shoemaker from the March 9, 2015 WorkCompCentral article:
“They don’t have anything else,’ Shoemaker said. ‘The British were throwing rocks at Washington as he crossed the Delaware River because the Hessians were too drunk to fire their muskets.”
7. This week’s communication with the office of California Governor Jerry Brown re: California’s criminal role in mass marketing insurer fraud over the mold issue via aiding the use of the debunked Veritox Theory to continue in policy, courts and physician miseducation:
“In a message dated 11/18/2015 12:30:27 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
Re: Do Something About the Corruption in the California Courts
Thank you for contacting Governor Brown regarding your experiences with a California Court Judge. The matter you discussed falls under the jurisdiction of the Commission on Judicial Performance. In order to ensure your concerns are properly addressed, please contact their office directly at:
Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102
We hope you find this information useful, and thank you again for contacting our office.
Office of Governor Jerry Brown”
Reply: “In a message dated 11/18/2015 12:50:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, SNK1955@aol.com writes:
With all due respect, the CJP has played a major role in aiding the systemic corruption to continue. The primary Justices I am complaining of are Justice Judith McConnell, former Chair of the CJP, and Justice Richard Huffman, former Chair of the Executive Committee of the Judicial Council.
This is not a small problem and the CJP has already refused to punish their former Chair for case fixing and covering up falsification of court documents. Its a multi-billion dollar insurer fraud scam they have been aiding and abetting by fraud upon the court.
This past weekend, I gave a presentation on this at a medical conference in AZ.
I blew a whistle on fraud over the mold issue in 2005. McConnell et.al. framed me for libel to keep the fraud going. They suppressed the evidence that a retired CDC NIOSH employee was an undisclosed party to the SLAPP. They suppressed the evidence that his business partner committed perjury to manufacture reason for malice.
They suppressed the evidence that the 2008 judgment from the case was back-dated and void on its face — as the jurists continued to use the void document as a foundation for a second SLAPP to try to silence me of their fraud in the first.
People all across the US are dying because of McConnell’s et.al.s decade of fraud upon the court.
There is a reason why the CA judicial branch just received an “F” for judicial accountability in a survey by the Center for Public Integrity.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No more buck passing.
Please read the below and its links. Its long past time for some accountability in the judicial branch — and the CJP is too politically compromised to do it.
This matter requires criminal prosecutions to save lives. The Governor’s office can be part of the process or part of the blind-eye problem.
When is Governor Brown going to do something to rid the Judicial Branch of criminals?
8. Governor Arnold Schwarnegger endorsed the fraudulent Veritox Theory/ACOEM Mold Statement into CDPH policy “Mold in Indoor Workplaces” in October of 2005. This was one month after the first California Judge, Michael P. Orfield (retired), suppressed the evidence in a September 2005 anti-SLAPP ruling that Mr. Kelman committed perjury to manufacture a reason for malice while trying to shut me up of the multi-billion dollar insurer fraud scam. TEN YEARS AGO!!!
Because of a decade of systemic corruption and retaliation under the color of law in the California courts, the debunked Veritox Theory continues to weasle it way into policies while disabling and killing people — all for the sake of the almighty dollar.
9. For a greater understanding of the unethical and criminal roles the State of California has played in mass-marketing hateful, discriminatory, and deadly insurer fraud over the mold issue from coast to coast please read,
“Justice Judith McConnell Grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon your court“. (Nov 2015) and
Sharon Noonan Kramer ~~ Retaliated against whistleblower for now ten years…and still not shutting up while people are dying from systemic corruption and cronyism over the mold issue! email@example.com
November 12, 2015
Laura E. Duffy, U.S. Attorney Southern California District
Re: Prosecute California Justice Judith McConnell for SLAPP case-fixing to aid billions of dollars in insurer fraud in discrimination of the environmentally disabled nationwide; while violating my rights under the American with Disabilities Act to advocate for the disabled without retaliation under the color of law. Federal 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201–12213 Title V
Dear U.S. Attorney Duffy,
This letter and corroborating evidence being sent to you may be read online at Katy’s Exposure blog under the title, “So Cal U.S. Atty Duffy, Prosecute the Deadly Corrupt in the San Diego Courts”. Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3YN and “American College of Medical Toxicology Choose Wisely to Sunset Your Mold Statement”. Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3VW
I am a medical journal published author regarding conflicts of interest when setting environmental public health policies. A decade ago, in 2005, I published a writing on the internet. The subject of my writing was of how it became a scientific fraud in U.S. public health policies and courts that it was proven Toxic Mold does not harm, and of the author of the scientific fraud (Bruce J. Kelman, President of Veritox, Inc.) getting caught weasling on a witness stand when having to discuss how it was mass-marketed. The fraud has been perpetrated by joined hands of toxic tort defense witnesses, “nonprofit” medical associations, the nation’s largest industry lobbyists, and D.C. politicians.
The scam is founded upon extrapolations applied to data taken from a single rodent study in 2001 (the Veritox Theory), mass marketed as scientific proof that mold toxins could never reach a level to harm in water damaged buildings. It has been the mainstay for defendants in mold litigation (primarily insurers) ever since. It has also been used by the USDOJ to defeat federal liability for disabilities caused by biocontaminants in water damaged buildings, such as military housing.
In 2006, Justices Judith McConnell, Cynthia Aaron, and Alex MacDonald of the California Fourth District Division One Court of Appeal (4th/1st) fixed their anti-SLAPP opinion to make my 2005 writing exposing the fraud appear to be a malicious lie – thereby aiding the fraud to flourish, grow, and continue to harm the lives of thousands.
 2006 fixed 4th/1st anti-SLAPP opinion Bruce J. Kelman & Veritox, Inc. vs. Sharon Kramer Case No. D047758 Opinion by Justices Judith McConnell, Cynthia Aaron, Alex MacDonald. Among other indiscretions, they suppressed the evidence that Mr. Kelman committed perjury to manufacture a needed reason for malice & suppressed the evidence that retired CDC employee Brian Hardin was a concealed party to the litigation as the sixth owner of Veritox, Inc. (formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc.)
All San Diego judges and justice to oversee the matter since have covered up and added to the case-fixing and framing for libel, while aiding and abetting the deadly insurer fraud scam to become even more deeply entrenched in U.S. courts and claims handling practices.
If at any time, officers of the San Diego Superior or Appellate Courts had not suppressed the direct evidence that the matter was a SLAPP matter, the deadly insurer fraud scam, based on the fraudulent risk assessment model, the Veritox Theory, would have immediately ceased in courtrooms and claims handling practices all across the U.S. Instead of saving lives by adhering to laws, the jurists chose to keep digging a deeper hole covering up for each other’s’ unlawful and criminal acts – while retaliating against me even harder for my refusal of silence of the lives continuing to be devastated by their multiple frauds upon the court.
In 2010, Justices Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman and Joann Irrion concealed in their appellate opinion that the 2008 judgment from the SLAPP was void on its face, rendering it a worthless piece of paper. Regardless of its nullity, court officers and the authors of the scientific fraud (Bruce Kelman and Brian Hardin of Veritox, Inc.) proceeded to use the void judgment as the foundational document to a second SLAPP beginning in 2010. All jurists were made aware that the judgment they were relying upon to feign their courts’ subject matter jurisdiction was fraudulent and void on its face.
 2010 fixed 4th/1st after trial opinion Bruce J. Kelman & Veritox, Inc. vs. Sharon Kramer Case No. D054496 concealing the 2008 void judgment Opinion by Justices Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman, Joan Irrion. They suppressed the evidence that the judgement document was fraudulent and back-dated by the trial court clerk and again suppressed the evidence that retired CDC employee Hardin was a concealed party to the litigation.
Finding themselves to be above the law, they were trying to harass me into silence, coram non judice, of the fraud upon the court by multiple jurists in the first fixed SLAPP being purposed toward aiding the deadly insurer fraud scam to continue in courtrooms from coast to coast.
In 2013, after three years of being horrifically harassed in the second SLAPP in courts with no subject matter jurisdiction and an additional void judgement issued, I filed a notice to appeal in Justice McConnell’s court. I waited for her to accept appellate jurisdiction. Then I challenged it before I would file an opening brief –because by law, courts with no subject matter jurisdiction, including an appellate courts, cannot issue rulings, orders and remittiturs.
Instead of doing the lawful thing of acknowledging that the judgment from the first SLAPP, sole foundational document to the second SLAPP, was void on its face and that her court had no subject matter jurisdiction – she issued a third fraudulent remittitur, coran non judice, and dismissed the case. Prior to dismissal, she refused multiple times to prove her court had subject matter jurisdiction. No justification for concealing the void judgments were ever given. No efforts were ever made to mitigate the continuing harm to the public, caused by the systemic corruption in the San Diego Superior and Appellate courts.
 2013 McConnell case dismissal of the second SLAPP while concealing that officers of the San Diego Superior courts harassed me for three years with a void judgement, knowing their courts had no subject matter jurisdiction — and leaving death, discrimination, insurer fraud and criminal fraud upon the court in her wake. Bruce J. Kelman v Sharon Kramer Case No. D062764
To this day, people are dying from Justice McConnell’s multiple acts of fraud upon the court to aid the discriminatory insurer fraud continuance nationwide (the Veritox Theory.)
For my efforts to try to stop the deadly scam, under the color of law in the San Diego courts I have been:
1) systematically character assassinated and libeled
2) driven into poverty,
3) had my career ruined by falsely being deemed someone who lies,
4) jailed by order of a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction,
5) bodily harmed,
7) given a false criminal FBI record by the local sheriff,
8) have tens of thousands of dollars of false liens recorded against my property,
9) am permanently enjoined by a court with no subject matter jurisdiction to never republish a sentence I never published in the first place,
10) threatened by a judge who knows that his court has no subject matter jurisdiction that should I motion again for the void judgments to be vacated I would be deemed a “vexatious litigant”, and
11) collusively harassed and bullied by officers of the California courts for now ten years.
It has all been to make me appear to be a liar and a lunatic for exposing how the heart of a multi-billion dollar insurer fraud scam, the Veritox Theory, was mass-marketed to discriminate against the environmentally disabled; and has been covered-up for now a decade by corrupt leading judicial officers of the California courts.
I want the corrupt San Diego judges and justices prosecuted for their collusively criminal acts to violate my right to advocate for the environmentally disabled being horrifically abused by systemic cronyism in the San Diego courts. These are jurists who are committing criminal acts and fraud upon courts who fall within your federal jurisdiction to prosecute. Federal 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201–12213. Title V includes an anti-retaliation or coercion provision. The Technical Assistance Manual for the ADA explains:
“III-3.6000 Retaliation or coercion. Individuals who exercise their rights under the ADA, or assist others in exercising their rights, are protected from retaliation. The prohibition against retaliation or coercion applies broadly to any individual or entity that seeks to prevent an individual from exercising his or her rights or to retaliate against him or her for having exercised those rights … Any form of retaliation or coercion, including threats, intimidation, or interference, is prohibited if it is intended to interfere.”
It is a criminal act under California Penal Code 134 to falsify and conceal falsifications of court documents. As the Presiding Justice acting in an administrative capacity, Justice McConnell has no judicial immunity from federal prosecution for her concealment of falsified court documents while case-fixing.
She has no immunity for dismissing a case and issuing fraudulent remittiturs to conceal that she knows a judgment document is void on its face – and that her peers used it, coram non judice, to harass a whistleblower of a multi-billion dollar, discriminatory insurer fraud scam.
I have filed motions numerous times for the remittiturs to be recalled and rescinded since 2010; and the void judgments to be vacated. Justice McConnell, being fully aware of the lives being devastated by the insurer fraud she has aided by fraud upon her court, repeatedly refuses to recall/rescind.
USDOJ DEADLY REFUSAL TO PROSECUTE ON AUGUST 7, 2015
This is my second request to the Southern California Office of the United States Department of Justice that Justice Judith McConnell et.al. be prosecuted for case fixing SLAPP suits to aid a massive insurer fraud scam. On August 8, 2015, I received an August 7th letter from your office stating your office refuses to prosecute. The letter came from U.S. Assistant Attorney Caroline Clark, who is now on extended leave.
On August 16, 2015, a mold injured teen, Jared Dussault, committed suicide in Florida because his family was being systematically bullied and harassed for stating that Toxic Mold in a water damaged rented apartment has severely harmed their health and devastated their lives. The horrific discrimination of this young man which drove him to suicide, never would have been able to happened had McConnell et.al. not been case-fixing in the California courts to aid the insurer fraud/scientific fraud for now over a decade.
Harassment of those disabled by contaminants in water damaged buildings is not an unusual occurrence in the United States. The illnesses are costly for stakeholders of water damaged buildings and their insurers. The Veritox Theory is repeatedly portrayed to be “current accepted science” to make the disabled appear to be lying about what is causing their disabilities.
As of November 10, 2015, Justice Judith McConnell is still refusing to recall and rescind the fraudulent 4th/1st remittiturs and vacate the void judgments in the SLAPP suits, which have CAUSED the deadly insurer fraud scam and deadly discrimination of the environmentally disabled to continue, nationwide.
As of November 10, 2015 the Center for Public Integrity is reporting that the State of California has received a well-deserved “F” for judicial accountability. As such, I want Justice Judith McConnell, Justice Richard Huffman, et.al. prosecuted for the future health, safety and welfare of the American public and for a future of renewed ethics in the California courts.
The USDOJ claims to be cracking down on corporate fraudsters and holding guilty parties personally accountable for the harm they cause. The USDOJ claims to be cracking down on local courts and other government agencies/entities involved in discrimination against classes of U.S. citizens via bullying, harassment and other criminal acts under the color of law. Your federal employer, the USDOJ, claims that no one is “too big to jail” and they are here for the public.
I will believe that the USDOJ is not just puffing about holding well-connected fraudsters personally accountable when I see your sister in the Lawyers Club, Justice Judith McConnell (former Chairwoman of the California Commission on Judicial Performance) and Justice Richard Huffman (former Chairman of the California Judicial Council Executive and Planning Committee) behind bars for their criminal roles in one of the largest and deadliest insurer fraud scams ever perpetrated on the citizens of the United States.
They have willfully abused their judicial offices to aid and abet a massive public fleecing to continue by their criminal acts in retaliation of a whistleblower of an insurer fraud scam, under the façade of law. Please let me know when your office intends to commence the investigations and prosecutions. People are still dying from the 4th/1st Justices’ continuing fraud upon the court.
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
CC: United States Attorney General Loretta Lynch sans enclosures 2- 5 which she already has.
November 11, 2015 letter to McConnell with her November 10, 2015 refusal to recall/rescind remittiturs attached. Read online in its entirety with supporting links at, “Justice Judith McConnell grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon the court.” Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3Yq
The 2008 void judgement from the first SLAPP, sole foundational document to the 2010 coram non judice second SLAPP. McConnell is covering-up this document as being fraud intricate to a national insurer fraud scam, while violating my rights under ADA, Federal 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201–12213 Title V https://katysexposure.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/15-10-29-exhibit-5.pdf
August 7, 2015 letter from So Cal USDOJ refusing to prosecute (note the reference to the FBI indicating my false criminal record was investigated before refusing to prosecute for the collusion to defraud by criminal means in San Diego government). http://freepdfhosting.com/aa5216c9c7.pdf
October 30, 2015 letter to USDOJ, DHHS and White House Office of Science & Technology re: the continuing discriminatory insurer fraud resultant from McConnell’s et.al, decade of case fixing SLAPP, for which your office has refused to prosecute. https://katysexposure.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/usdoj-letter-with-exhibits.pdf
October 30, 2015 letter to the “nonprofit” American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) requesting they cease marketing discriminatory insurer fraud (the Veritox Theory) with the use of federal funds — that McConnell is also aiding to continue by refusing to cause the vacating of void SLAPP judgments. Veritox Theory attached as Exhibit 2 Read online at: https://katysexposure.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/15-10-29-final-acmt-letter.pdf
November 11, 2015
Re: Recall and rescind the Veritox, Inc. SLAPP suit remittiturs of your own accord. People are dying from your decade of fraud upon your court. I am not going to stop asking until you agree stop the deaths by admitting your fraud upon the court – or someone makes you admit it.
Thank you for directing your clerks to put it into writing on November 9, 2015, that you again refuse to stop the deadly and discriminatory harm to thousands of Americans. The harm is caused, not by your court, but by you as an officer of the court case-fixing SLAPP suits purposed toward aiding a massive insurer fraud scam (the Veritox Theory) to continue in courts and claims handling practices all across the nation.
The reply letter I received came from a clerk in the 4th/1st. However, as you know, the letter I sent on October 30, 2015 (with the attached evidence of material court document falsifications in SLAPP and resultant deadly discrimination of the environmentally disabled) was not addressed to the court. It was addressed and sent to you, personally, requesting that you “grow a conscience”.
As you know, it is a felony under California Penal Code 134 to falsify and conceal falsification of court documents. As you know, jurists such as yourself who conceal falsified court documents while their courts have no subject matter jurisdiction and/or are acting in an administrative capacities, also have no judicial immunity from prosecution for the criminal acts to defraud.
With your repeated refusals (dodging) to acknowledge your personal concealment of known falsified court documents, are you saying that:
1. you believe yourself, Justices Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman, Cynthia Aaron, Alex MacDonald, Joann Irrion and several San Diego Superior Court judges to be above the law when collusively working to manufacture and conceal falsified court documents in SLAPP?
2. you believe you and your jurist peers are too big to jail for aiding a multi-billion dollar insurer fraud scam by fraud upon your courts?
3. you are a willing participant in the massive insurer fraud scam founded upon a scientific fraud (Veritox Theory)?
4. you believe because Mr. Bruce Kelman, Mr. Brian Hardin and their corporation, Veritox, Inc. are toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the United States Department of Justice that they, too, are above the law when committing criminal acts as plaintiffs in the California courts?
5. you do not care that your criminal acts over the past decade have aided to harm, devastate and shorten the lives of thousands?
What are you saying with your repeated refusals and dodges to follow the law to stop the deadly harm to Americans; and to stop the relentless retaliation of me under the color of law for exposing it? What gives you the legal right to continue to refuse to recall and rescind remittiturs when the evidence is clear you are covering up court document falsifications in SLAPP which aids a massive, deadly and discriminatory insurer fraud scam to continue?
Attached hereto again is the voluminous evidence of the discrimination of the environmentally disabled and dying that you have caused and continue to cause by your unrepentant case-fixing. In relevant parts of the again attached exhibit, the following is accurately stated and clearly evidenced as true:
(Page 26) “As a mere example of what the Fourth District Division One Court of Appeal (4th/1st) justices knew they were aiding to continue by concealing Mr. Kelman’s perjury and multiple court document falsifications in SLAPPs, is my January 2010 Reply to the 4th/1st Query. It states,
‘When this Reviewing Court acknowledges what legally cannot be denied: Kramer’s overwhelming, uncontroverted and irrefutable evidence that seven judges and justices ignored Kramer’s overwhelming, uncontroverted and irrefutable evidence of Kelman’s perjury on the issue of malice and ignored Kramer’s vast evidence of Scheuer’s willful suborning of Kelman’s criminal perjury; then seven years-worth of scientific fraud perpetrated on US Courts over the mold issue by the US Chamber of Commerce et al, will immediately cease by the acknowledgment that their author of their scientific fraud has no qualms about lying under oath to the courts and strategically litigating..”
In the process of case-fixing SLAPP for mass insurer fraud while causing discrimination of the environmentally disabled, they also egregiously violated federal law and my civil rights to lawfully advocate for the environmentally disabled without criminal retaliation by compromised court officers and their clerks, aiding corporate fraudsters and their attorney. ”
(Page 27) “Additionally, as a result of California court officers collusively fixing the first SLAPP suit and their clerks falsifying multiple court documents and electronic case records, Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer began recording tens of thousands of dollars of fraudulent liens against my property in 2009 by use of a 2008 court-issued fraudulent abstract of judgment. The abstract shows a date of judgement entry of September 24, 2008. This is not possible and there is no notice of entry of judgement for that date.  
The faces of the abstract and resultant lien from the first SLAPP provide direct evidence that interest miraculously (and criminally) accrues from a date before costs were submitted by Mr. Scheuer on October 14, 2008. The abstract and lien differ from the face of the equally fraudulent void judgement, which shows a date of entry of judgment as December 18, 2008. There is no notice of entry of judgement dated December 18, 2008, because it did not happen. The judgment document from the first SLAPP is a fraud.
(Page 32) “Their fearless crimes with no concern of being held accountable appears to be justified “I am above the law” mentalities. From 2010 to 2013, leading California justices (who oversee cases in the 4th/1st and who fixed their appellate opinions beginning in 2006 while suppressing the evidence of Mr. Kelman’s perjury and falsification of multiple court documents) repeatedly refused to recall the remittiturs and vacate the void judgements in both SLAPP suits. 
To date, no one in government will punish the gang of black-robed hooligans who operate out of San Diego and whose ring-leaders have basically run the California judicial branch (into the ground) for years.     This, while the Veritox Theory has played on to harm thousands directly as a result of years of criminal acts in the San Diego, California courts.”
(Page 35) “When I tried to stop the harassment and stop the damages on my own, I insisted in 2013 that 4th/1st Appellate Court Presiding Justice McConnell prove her court’s subject matter jurisdiction before I would file an opening appellate brief. She simply ignored the evidence that her court’s jurisdiction had been challenged in the second SLAPP. Justice Patricia Benke simultaneously refused to recall the fraudulent remittitur and vacate the void judgment from the first SLAPP. That void judgment was the document McConnell was relying upon to feign jurisdiction in the second SLAPP. While suppressing the direct evidence that her court did not have subject matter jurisdiction, and thus I could not file an opening brief until she proved it did, she chose instead to simply issue a third fraudulent remittitur from her court dismissing the case, coram non judice.
It was shortly after this that Judge Robert Dahlquist issued the thinly veiled threat in March 2013 that should I motion again for the falsified court documents/remittiturs/judgments to be vacated, Mr. Scheuer’s motions to have me deemed a ‘vexatious litigant’ would stand a good chance of being granted, coram non judice. I got the message loud and clear. Scheuer’s 2013 vexatious motion was denied ‘without prejudice’. [See fn 103]”
(Page 38) “In July of 2012, Judge Thomas Nugent issued a void permanent injunction to cast doubt that I was telling the truth of the case-fixings purposed to fleecing the public with the Veritox Theory. Making it appear that I was lawfully found guilty of libel and that my 2005 writing was maliciously false; Judge Nugent bestowed upon me a distinction that I believe makes me one-of-a-kind.
I am most likely the only United States citizen to have a void permanent injunction, issued from a court with no subject matter jurisdiction, to never republish a sentence that I never published in the first place. Lawfully published here is the sentence for which I am ‘permanently enjoined’ to never ‘republish’ by a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction because he knowingly used a prior void judgment to feign his court’s jurisdiction:
‘Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ while he testified as a witness in an Oregon trial.’ ”
(Page 42) “Corroborated by evidence, Mr. Kelman, Veritox and their attorney Mr. Scheuer, clearly possess ‘Toxic Clout’  making them ‘too big to jail’ by the USDOJ  for criminal acts in SLAPP to defraud the public.
This appears to be because of all of the fearless California jurists and other public servants who would need to be jailed alongside them for the case-fixing and cover-up by criminal means  – or – because the USDOJ uses the Veritox Theory to defeat liability for WDB disabilities of federal employees and THEIR families.
From 2004 to date, the USDOJ has hired Veritox, Inc. as expert witnesses multiple times reportedly paying them nearly $1,000.000.00. The Veritox Theory has been repeatedly used by USDOJ attorneys to defeat claims of federal liability caused by negligent maintenance of WDB military housing and various federal buildings.  
Under new leadership, the USDOJ claims to be holding corporate fraudsters personally accountable for harming the United States public by unlawful and criminal acts. [See fn 144] They claim to be cracking down on discriminatory acts by government employees in local jurisdictions who violate civil rights. 
Yet the USDOJ’s promises of renewed ethics, of holding corporate fraudsters accountable, and of stopping civil rights violations by government employees, ring hollow. The promises of prosecution for collusive criminal acts appear not to apply when the USDOJ has an ugly stake in the game.
On August 7, 2015, a letter was sent to me from the office of the USDOJ Attorney Southern District of California refusing to prosecute for the collusive fraud upon the court in the SLAPP suits causing mass discrimination of [water-damaged-building] WDB-disabled on behalf of WDB-stakeholders, including the United States government; while violating my right to advocate for the WDB-disabled. ”
(Page 56) Self-evident that scientists and physicians being forced to pay much money to be board certified by ‘nonprofit’ medical boards is clearly not ‘a reliable indicator of proficiency’; or that required periodic re-certification will aid to ‘demonstrate command of a body of knowledge that is essential to current professional practice’; the [October 2015 Environmental Health Perspectives] EHP “Standards of Knowledge…” was co-authored by Mr. Kelman.
In addition to being a long-term and prolific toxic tort defense expert witness, a creator of the greatly flawed and widely mass-marketed LNT Veritox Theory, a paid-for-hire science fraud author for industry lobbyists, a hired gun of insurers and the USDOJ, and a criminal perjurer & recorder of fraudulent liens in California courts — all for the purpose of profitably abusing the science of toxicology to discriminate against the environmentally disabled – he is also a Diplomat and board member of the “nonprofit” accrediting board, [American Board of Toxicology] ABT. Thus, a criminal is writing the standards for toxicological practices in the United States. Why?
Criminal Kelman’s two co-authors for the EHP ‘Standards of Knowledge..’ are an employee of the DOD and an employee of a pharmaceutical company. [See fn 184] Thus, a criminal is writing the standards for toxicological practices in the United States with a United States federal employee. Why?
(Page 66) “Life has certainly been no walk in the park for the past ten years, because I dared to expose how the LNT Veritox Theory of Mr. Kelman’s and Mr. Hardin’s was mass-marketed into policy and courts by compromised “nonprofit” medical associations; along with the building-related stakeholder industries, government agencies, and PAC-funded-politicians for whom the ‘learned medical bodies’ shill.
Under the color of law, I have been systematically character assassinated, driven into poverty, had my career ruined by falsely being deemed someone who lies, jailed, bodily harmed, cyberstalked, given a false criminal FBI record, have tens of thousands of dollars of false liens recorded against my property, and permanently enjoined by a court with no subject matter jurisdiction to never republish a sentence I never published in the first place. It was all to make me appear to be a liar and a lunatic for exposing how a massive fraud, the Veritox Theory, was mass-marketed to discriminate against the WDB environmentally disabled, and it has been covered-up by corruption of leading judicial officers in the California courts — for the sake of the all mighty dollar.
Until Justice Judith McConnell Presiding Justice of the California Fourth District Division One Court of Appeal grows a conscience and recalls the three fraudulent remittiturs from the SLAPP suits brought by Mr. Kelman and Veritox, purposed to try to silence me of the massive damaged done by use and proliferation of the Veritox Theory, Mr. Kelman and the ilks of Veritox will continue to generate income from selling the false concept that it is proven [chronic inflammatory response from wdb contaminants] CIRS-WDB and [environmental intolerances] EI are only figments of people’s imaginations. The broken bodies and broken lives will continue to pile up in the wake of Mr. Kelman not being punished as a criminal when a plaintiff in SLAPP.”
At 3 o’clock on Saturday, November 14, 2015, I am giving a presentation at a medico-legal conference “State Of The Art In Mold, Wet Buildings & CIRS”. The gist is of how your decade of fraud upon your court continues to injure, disable and kill many U.S. citizens by your aiding and abetting the proliferation and usage of the Veritox Theory (aka the heart of a deadly insurer fraud scam); and of how no one in government will punish you for your criminal role — to stop the deadly scam.
For a mere $99, Justice McConnell, you can listen to my presentation live at the following link: http://survivingmold.cleeng.com/state-of-the-art-in-mold-wet-buildings-cirs-sponsored-by-crbai/E651731905_US
This letter to you, personally, may be read online at Katy’s Exposure Blog with links to corroborating evidence under the titled, “Justice Judith McConnell grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon the court.” Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3Yq
See Katy’s Exposure blog, “American College of Medical Toxicology, Choose Wisely to Sunset Your Mold Statement”, for (some of) who else knows within government that your acts over this matter are demonstrative of a severely compromised California Justice. Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3VW
You are tax-payer-funded to be a public servant. Yet, it there was ever a compettion of Judith McConnell and Bruce Kelman vs. Bill Cosby for predatory narcisists’ ability to feign respectablity; I feel certain that you and Mr. Kelman would win, hands down.
Recall and rescind the fraudulent remittiturs from Veritox’s SLAPP suits against me and cause the void judgment to be vacated. By law, there is no statute of limitations on the recalls and rescissions. Thus, there is no legal excuse for you to avoid admitting that you have acted as a menace to the exact society that you are paid to serve — in the capacity of a compromised California Justice who has practiced politics – not law – from your bench.
Please grow a conscience and recall/rescind the remittiturs. People are dying from your fraud upon the court when fixing Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation and trying to cover it up by a decade of criminal means.
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
Your latest refusal to follow the law (while abusing your court to do your bidding, yet again) dated November 9, 2015
My letter to you, personally, dated October 29, 2015 with the direct evidence that you know you are concealing the criminal origins and usages of void judgments in SLAPP.
Letter to the American College of Medical Toxicology that was enclosed in my 10.29.15 letter to you showing you know how many people are being disabled and discriminated against directly because of your case-fixing SLAPP suits in furtherance of a massive insurer fraud scam – the Veritox Theory.
 Veritox Theory – a flawed risk assessment model that has been mass marketed by “nonprofits” as current accepted science in furtherance of insurer fraud –the mainstay of the defense in mold litigation since 2002
 Nov 9, 2015 letter from 4th/1st Court shielding Justice Judith Judith McConnell from having to personally answer for her personal fraud upon the court in SLAPP to defraud the United States public.
 October 29, 2015 letter addressed to Justice Judith McConnell with direct evidence of her concealment of void SLAPP judgments purposed toward aiding the continuance of a deadly insurer fraud scam (the Veritox Theory).
 Yellow post-it court notice attached to the 2008 falsified judgment in the matter of Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc., vs Sharon Kramer, North San Diego Superior Court GIN044539, mailed from the court in January 2009. Note the file stamp meaning this was provided as evidence to the 4th/1st Court of Appeal. The appellate justices concealed the Penal Code 134 violations by clerks of the court. Mr. Kelman and his attorney, Mr. Scheuer, then proceeded to use the fraudulent court document as the sole foundational document to a second SLAPP trying to silence me of California case-fixing purporsed toward profitable insurer fraud, nationwide. (GlobalTox is now Veritox, Inc.)