Louisiana – Corruption spreads & infests the judicial system like toxic mold

To protect certain interests, judges in Louisiana (even at the expense appearing ignorant) will determine – even though FACTS prove otherwise – that there are NO scientific or medical authorities which even establish a general causal relationship between molds and human health.

This is a guaranteed conclusion ESPECIALLY if you are the unfortunate victim of an exposure to toxin producing molds at abnormal concentrations in an apartment leased to you.  And even though you know the facts, and even if you are sick and your baby is sick and all of your possessions are now covered and being consumed by the mold – you will pay for that apartment even if you have to leave and pay to live somewhere else.  If you can’t afford to do that then you can stay in your toxic apartment and pay to be poisoned. 

Lots of people have toxic investments that produce good income and these must be protected.  katy

By ALLEN M. JOHNSON JR
Advocate – New Orleans bureau
Mar 31, 2009

Court upholds rejection of housing mold lawsuit

NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court has let stand a lower court ruling dismissing a $1.1 million civil suit by two women who blamed their health problems on “toxic mold” found in their Slidell apartment.

In a decision published late Friday, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Judge Carl J. Barbier of the federal Eastern District of Louisiana at New Orleans did not err July 17 when he threw out a suit by Heather Jenkins and Melissa Dawn McKee, former tenants of Unit 1103 of the Greenbrier Estates apartments at Slidell.

Judge Barbier also correctly rejected the testimony of three witnesses for the two women — Chester J. Doll, Johnny Belenchia and Ernest D. Lykissa — who failed to meet federal court standards for expert testimony, the 5th Circuit opinion stated.

Without the expert testimony, the 5th Circuit ruling stated, Jenkins and McKee “obviously had insufficient evidence to pursue their claims” against the defendants: Slidella, LLC and Sizeler Real Estate Management Co. Inc and Flournoy Construction Co. LLC. Slidella and Sizeler owned and operated the unit, built by Flournoy.

Jenkins and McKee lived at the apartment from Feb. 1, 2004, through July 2004.

Mold was detected both before and after the women occupied the unit, according to an appellate filing by the defendants’ attorney, William L. Brockman, of Metairie.

However, Brockman’s brief argued that the defense presented “ample evidence, and the District Court agreed, that there are no medical or scientific authorities which even establish a general causal relationship, much less a specific causation” between mold exposure and “injurious consequences to human health.”

He added that Jenkins and McKee broke their lease and vacated Unit 1103 based on their “unfounded concerns” about mold.

2theadvocate.com

This entry was posted in Environmental Health Threats, Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Riverstone Residential, Toxic Mold and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s