ARIZONA APPELLATE COURT DEFINES “OUTRAGEOUS! BEHAVIOR” AND THEN PROCEEDS TO PRACTICE IT, JUST LIKE THE SAN DIEGO COURTS HAVE FOR FIVE YEARS OVER THE SAME ISSUES – Fraud In Health Marketing By the US Chamber of Commerce et al. Submitting Known False Legal Documents By Licensed Attorneys

The Appellate Court ruled in the Az Case involving infant deaths and a moldy apartment on July 27th.  Within the ruling they spelled out what constitutes “Outrageous!” behavior (pg 33) while Outrageously! stating none of this type of behavior has occurred by the defense side in this case.

According to the AZ Appellate Panel of three judges , “An action is ‘extreme and outrageous’ if it ‘falls at the very extreme edge of the spectrum of possible conduct’ and goes ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency, [so as] to be regarded as atrocious[] and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.’ Watts v. Golden Age Nursing Home, 127 Ariz. 255, 257, 619 P.2d 1032, 1035 (1980) (citations omitted); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46(1) cmt. d (1965)’

The Az Appellate Panel then proceeded to exhibit Outrageous! behavior by apparently pretending the irrefutable evidence of the fraud within the National Apartment  Association political action committee (“NAA Pac”) Amicus submitted in the case does not exist.  The submitted NAA Pac Amicus cited to the US Chamber’s “Scientific View” of environmental science as paid for to be penned by two of the defense experts in the same case the Az Appellate Panel is overseeing, Kelman and (purportedly) Robbins of VeriTox, Inc.

When helping their NAA members, such as Wasatch Property Management in this case, avoid liability for tenant injury and even death, the NAA told this Az Appellate court via via their amicus that, “a panel of scientists..stated that years of intense study have failed to produce any causal connection between exposure to indoor mold and adverse health effects”. They do this, with the assistance of the US Chamber of Commerce and the University of California names on their legal documents used to lend credibility to the false words.

Yet, while misleading the courts that mold does not harm their tenants, the NAA blogs to its members of the true science, “..mold can cause major health problems and even death.”

These VeriTox, Inc, US Chamber authors sure do seem to be lucky guys when it comes to justice being blind.  I know because they sued me for libel for the word “altered” in 2005 while claiming it was a malicious accusation of perjury.  As irrefutably evidenced for the San Diego courts since 2005, Kelman then committed perjury to make up and establish a fictional reason for me to harbor malice for him, personally.  By shear coincidence I guess, my word “altered” just happened to be used in the first public writing of the deceit in 2005, that the Az Appellate Court now just can’t seem to grasp even as late as 2010.  I suppose “Outrageous! behavior” by the US Chamber of Commerce,  the NAA and others might be one phrase to describe the situation. 

Personally, I think interstate insurance fraud by mass marketing scientific misinformation in the courts to gain unfair advantage so that stakeholders of moldy buildings can deny responsibility – primarily insurers, builders, employers and property management companies – might qualify as something more than just Outrageous! Blinded injustices by justices favorable to the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce appears to be even more “Outrageous! behavior”.

The San Diego courts have been informed no less than 15 times of the Chamber author Kelman’s perjury while strategically litigating over this matter now impacting the Az courts.  Justice Judith McConnell, current Chair of the California Commission on Judicial Performance, wrote the unpublished Appellate anti-SLAPP opinion. It was a unanimous, unpublished Appellate opinion issued on November 16, 2006 with Justices Cynthia Aaron and Alex McDonald concurring – and no one addressing the evidence that NIOSH/US Chamber author Bryan Hardin’s name was oddly missing from the Certificate of Interested Parties or that his US Chamber co-author and business partner, Kelman, was committing criminal perjury to establish a libel law needed reason for personal malice. When also provided with unrefuted evidence, four San Diego lower court judges failed to understand this – just like the anti-SLAPP Appellate panel did in 2006. The San Diego courts have been provided uncontroverted and irrefutable evidence of Kelman’s perjury to establish a needed libel law reason for malice for him personally, no less than fifteen times since September of 2005.

From my writing of 2005, naming the names of those involved in the fraud in health marketing over the mold issue that is now going unaddressed (again) by the Az Appellate Court:

Dr. Bruce Kelman of GlobalTox, Inc (now VeriTox), a Washington based environmental risk management company, testified as an expert witness for the defense, as he does in mold cases throughout the country. Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand. He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure. Although much medical research finds otherwise, the controversial piece claims that it is not plausible the types of illnesses experienced by the Haynes family and reported by thousands from across the US, could be caused by “toxic mold” exposure in homes, schools or office buildings.

In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.”

If at anytime within the last five years even ONE San Diego judge or justice would have acknowledged the Chamber author Kelman’s  perjury on the issue of malice while strategically litigating to silence me…these false legal documents in the Az courts by the NAA PAC and their attorneys would not even be allowed to occur today in a litigation involving infant deaths. Thus far, NONE have taken any action to stop the fruits of the US Chamber author’s criminal perjury going unchecked by the San Diego courts; as illustrated by the Az Appellate Court’s Outrageous! behavior.

When this discrepancy –  NAA legal documents in the Az case citing to the US Chamber’s “environmental science” directly conflicting to the NAA blog advisories to members – was brought to the attention of NAA’s “legal” counsel, John McDermott, by a reporter in July 2010, he said: “It’s best to have a happy tenant who pays the rent. And a tenant blaming a landlord for sickness is not likely to be happy or timely with payments’, he said. Though the NAA has argued in court that scientific evidence does not support a link between mold and sickness, the group provides members with a lease addressing mold. It also strives to educate tenants and maintenance workers on how to avoid mold.”

(Note: So are tenants who are claiming they lost new born infants from a moldy apartment and are faced with a fraudulent NAA Amicus going Outrageously! unaddressed by Az appellate judges overseeing the case inclined to be happy tenants of NAA members? NO!  And neither is the American public.  It is Outrageous! and it is judicially unbridled interstate insurance fraud by the US Chamber and their affiliates of property managers, insurers, and other stakeholders that this continues in US courts to this very day.)

A mere snippets of what the Az Appellate panel was informed of the deceptive matter performed by the “friend of the court” NAA attorneys and Outrageously! did not even mention in their ruling:


The AZ Appellate panel also found in their July 27th ruling,  “Generally, the case is one in which the recitation of the facts to an average member of the community would arouse his resentment against the actor, and lead him to exclaim, ‘Outrageous!.”

The public – including scientists, physicians and industrial hygienists – HAVE exclaimed “Outrageous!” of the  interstate insurance fraud perpetrated by the US Chamber of Commerce & other interested and complict parties, such as the NAA and the University of California.  

California Governor Arnold Schwazenegger who is President of the Regents of the University of California along with Regent CEO Gould  and UC President Yudof, and their legal counsel have been MORE than informed by the public of how the UC is playing an intricate part in the interstate insurance fraud over the mold issue; by the UC name being misused to lend false credibility to the “environmental science “of the US Chamber.  The National Apartment Association attorneys were directly requested to withdraw the fraudulent Amicus brief before the Appellate ruling.

“May 19, 2010

Dear Mr. Clark,

I think you should withdraw that NAA Amicus from the Abad Case.  It is counter-productive to the interests of the Property Mgmt Company and their Insurer.

If they win the appeal, they do not win when licensed attorneys submit documents into legal proceeding while promoting false science according to the NAA… for the purpose of unduly influencing  judicial rulings.

Thank you,
Sharon Kramer” 

Unfortunately, some of those involved in the unbridled insurance fraud occurring in the Arizona litigation, write the workers comp guidelines for the state of California – American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).  It is this platform of “Workers Comp Reform” that brought Governor Schwarzenegger into office with the backing of the Chamber of Commerce.  This situation is dangerous in that it is potentially influencing who will soon oversee the largest US court system, California’s, as the highest judicuary in the land.

To be clear, government entities involved in permitting this unbridled, interstate insurance fraud that is illustrated by the Az Appellate Outrageous ruling,  know the score. They have been told and evidenced of the following:

The US Chamber medico-legal fraud in health marketing that carries the University of California name used to bias the courts:

1. Was a paid for hire endeavor.

2. The contract for its authorship was only between the Corp of GlobalTox (now VeriTox) and the Manhattan Institute think-tank (self professed “gurus of tort reform”)

3. Nowhere is UC name or the UC physician, Andrew Saxon MD, who purportedly co-authored, found anywhere within the paper – except as being listed as an author.

4. No hours were billed in the creation of the Chamber paper, for anyone conferring with Saxon, the UC physician.

5. Saxon claims under oath he had no knowledge he was named as authoring the US Chamber publication and had not even read it as late as 3 years after its publication.

6. One Veritox owner, Kelman, has stated under oath that they were hired by the Manhattan Institute to write something for judges.

7. Another Veritox owner, Hardin, has stated under oath that the Chamber paper he co-authored with Kelman was a lobbying piece.

8. UC listed author, Saxon, was not paid, like Hardin and Kelman to author this fraud in health marketing.

9. No one claims authorship of the US Chamber publication on their CVs.

10. Saxon is the only physician and only non-Veritox owner listed as a purported co- author of the US Chamber paper– that falsely carries his and thus the UC name and bias the courts by lending false credibility to the US Chamber’s “environmental science”.

11. The Regents of the UC will take no action to have the UC name removed from the Chamber paper that is used to instill bias in the courts.

12. Neither will Saxon. He can’t without exposing his ACOEM mold statement co-authors, Hardin and Kelman, for putting his and the UC name of the US Chamber marketing piece, without his knowledge.

13. The University of California has generated much income via expert defense witness fees paid to the Regents when Saxon and other UC physicians use the Chamber et al’s, fraud in health marketing to bias the courts against injured workers and others.

14. ACOEM writes the workers comp guidelines that physicians in the State of California must follow under the guise of Workers Comp “Reform”.

“We are cleaning up the system,” “We will terminate the fraud and abuse that was going on in the system.” “No longer will workers’ compensation be the poison of our economy.” “Those who were gaming the system, we’re saying, ‘Hasta la vista,’ because the game is over.” “California is open for business.” Governor Schwarzenegger, President of the Regents of the University of California before the California Chamber of Commerce. 2005

“Generally, the case is one in which the recitation of the facts to an average member of the community would arouse his resentment against the actor, and lead him to exclaim, ‘Outrageous!.” Arizona Appellate Court, Division One, Ann A. Scott Timmer, Chief Judge Patricia K. Norris, Presiding Judge, Maurice Portley, Judge – July 27, 2010.

TRUTH OUT Sharon Kramer Letter To Andrew Saxon MOLD ISSUE | Katy’s Exposure

Cover letters that went to the following people on April 28, 2010 with the “Truth Out” document attached:

Board Of Regents University of California

Arnold Schwarzenegger
President of Regents UC
300 South Spring Street, Suite 167
Los Angeles, California 90013
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Russell Gould
Chair of the Board of Regents UC
1111 Franklin Street, 12th floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Sherry Lancing
Vice Chair, Board of Regents UC
1111 Franklin Street, 12th floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Cheryl Vacca
Vice President, Ethics & Compliance
1111 Franklin Street, 12th floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Charles Robinson
Vice President, General Counsel
1111 Franklin Street, 12th floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Employees of the University of Calfornia

Mark G. Yudof
President of the UC
1111 Franklin Street, 12th floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Erwin Chemerinsky
Environmental Law
Dean, UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Drive, Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Lisa Bero
UCSF Tobacco Legacy Library
University of California, SF
3333 California Street, Suite 420
San Francisco, CA 94143–0613
(
email)

Robert Kosnec, MD, MPH
President, AOEC
UC San Francisco
2380 Sutter Street, 3rd Fl
San Francisco, CA 94115
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Gina Solomon
Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC),
Associate Director PEHSU
UC San Francisco
2380 Sutter Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94115
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Marion Fedoruk, FACOEM
Exponent, Inc
Occupational and Environmental Health Clinic
AOEC/PEHSU
UC Irvine
5201 California Avenue, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92617
(
email no cover)

Phillip Harber, FACOEM
Occupational & Environmental Medicine
UC Los Angeles
10940 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1220
Los Angeles, California 90024
(
email no cover)

US Chamber ILR 

Lisa A. Rickard, Esq.
President,
1615 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20062-2000
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Manhattan Institute CLPLawrence J. Mone,
President
52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

The Travelers Companies Mr. Jay Fishman                                                                                                                     
Chairman and CEO
485 Lexington Ave.
New York, NY 10017
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

National Apartment Association 
Kevin H. Brown
Chief Executive Officer
4300 Wilson Boulevard, Su 400
Arlington, Virginia 22203
(
cc’d via certified letter)

National Apartment Association Legal Counsel                                                                       

John McDermott, Esq.
Legal Counsel NAA
4300 Wilson Boulevard, Su 400
Arlington, Virginia 22203
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

W. Michael Semko
Legal Counsel NAA
4300 Wilson Boulevard, Su 400
Arlington, Virginia 22203
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Attorney for NAA Amicus 
Scott Clark, Esq.
Az. Bar No. 6759
Offices of Scott M. Clark
3008 North 44th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85018-7
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Defense Counsel                                                                                                               
Mr. Russell Hiles, Esq.
Cal. Bar No. 59502
Stone & Hiles
16633 Ventura Blvd #1420
Encino, CA 91436
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Frank Kuratz, Esq
Stone & Hiles
Ca. Bar No 74668
16633 Ventura Blve
Encino, CA 91436
(
cc’d via notarized letter)

Cynthia Kuhn, Esq.
Arizona Bar No. 10969
Rusing & Lopez, PLLC
6262 North Swan, Su 200
Tuscon, AZ 85718
(
email)

American College of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Pamela A. Hymel,
President,
25 Northwest Point Blvd., 700
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007-1030
(
cc’d via certified letter)

American Academy of Allergy,
Asthma & Immunology
Paul A. Greenberger, MD,
President,
555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100
Milwaukee, WI 53202-3823
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Association of Occupational & Environmental Clinics                                                            

Robert Kosnec, MD, MPH
President,
UC San Francisco
2380 Sutter Street, 3rd Fl
San Francisco, CA 94115
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Collegium Ramazinni
Phillip Landrigan
President
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
1212 Fifth Avenue, 1A
One Gustave L. Levy Pl.
New York, New York 10029
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Healthy Schools Network, Inc
John Shaw
President,.
110 Maryland Ave NE, 505
Washington, DC 20002
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Healthy Schools Network
Claire Barnett
Executive Director,
773 Madison Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
(
email)

Natural Resource Defense Council
Gina Solomon
Associate Director PEHSU
UC San Francisco
2380 Sutter Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94115
(
cc’d via certified letter)

American Academy of Pediatrics
Judith Palfrey
President,
Children’s Hospital Boston
Division of General Pediatrics – Wolbach 2
300 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Paul W. Brandt-Rauf, MD, ScD, DrPH
Editor
1175 SPHPI, MC 923
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, IL
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Donald Leung
Editor
1400 Jackson St
National Jewish Medical & Research
Denver, CO 80206
(
cc’d via certified letter)

International Journal of Occupational And Environmental Health
Dr. David Egilman
Editor
8 N. Main Street Su 404
Attleboro, MA 02703
(
email)

Chief, Section of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Dr. Jay Portnoy
The Children’s Mercy Hospital
2401 Gillham Road
Kansas City, MO 64108
(
email)

The State Bar of California                                                                                                          
Howard Miller
State Bar President
180 Howard Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Russell Wiener,
Interim Chief Trial Counsel Intake Office
1149 South Hill St.
Los Angeles, CA 90015
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Mr. Keith Scheuer, Esq.
Cal. Bar No. 82797
Scheuer & Gillett
4640 Admiralty Way, 402
Marina Del Rey, California 90292
Attorney Kelman & 4 VeriTox owners
(
cc’d via certified letter)

The California Commission On Judicial Performance

Justice Judith McConnell Chairperson
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Katherine Feinstein
Vice Chairperson
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Anthony Capozzi, Esq
Commissioner
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Judge Kenneth K. So
San Diego Presiding Court Judge
Main Courthouse
Fifth Floor
220 W. Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
(
cc’d via certified letter)

California US Senator
Bettina Poirier
General Counsel,
Barbara Boxer
Chair, Env. & Public Works Committee;
Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee
112 Hart Senate Office Bldg
District of Columbia 20510-0505
(
fax)

California US Senator,
Dianne Feinstein (mother of CJP member Kathrine Feinstein, wife of UC Regent, Blum)
Judiciary Committee
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, California 94104
(
fax)

US Senator, Arizona
John McCain
HELP Committee
5353 North 16th Street, Suite 105
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
(
fax)

US Senator, New Jersey
Frank Lautenberg
Environment & Public Works Committee
Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee
1 Gateway Center, 23rd Floor
Newark, New Jersey 07102
(
fax)

California 30th District Congress
Robin Appleberry
General Counsel,
Henry Waxman
2204 Rayburn Office Building,
District of Columbia 20515-0530
(
fax)

California Congress 7th District
George Miller
Chair of HELP Committee
Califonia 7th 1333 Willow Pass Road, Suite 203
Concord, California 94520
(
fax)

California Congress 42nd District
Gary Miller
US Chamber Keynote Speaker 7.17.03
1800 East Lambert Road, Suite 150
Brea, California 92821
(
fax and sent along with US Chamber)

Congress, TN 6th District
Bart Gordon
Chair, Science & Technology Committee
305 West Main Street
Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130
(
fax)

US Senator, Iowa
Tom Harkin
Chair of HELP Committee
210 Walnut Street, Room 733
Des Moines, Iowa 50309 (
fax)

Congress MI 14th District
John Conyers
Chair, Judiciary Committee
231 West Lafayette Boulevard,
669 Federal Building
Detroit, Michigan 48226
(
fax)

California Attorney General
Edmond Brown
California Department of Justice
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA
(
cc’d via registered letter – to be sent)

US Attorney General
Eric Holder
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20530
(
cc’d via registered letter – to be sent)

Environmental Information Association
Michael Breu
President
Fiberquant Analytical Services
5025 S. 33rd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85040
(
email 3)

Village Voice Media
Steven P. Suskin
General Counsel
1201 East Jefferson Street
Phoenix, AZ 85034
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Village Voice Media
Michael Lacey
Owner
1201 East Jefferson Street
Phoenix, AZ 85034
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Los Angeles Press Club
Will Lewis
President
4773 Hollywood Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90027-5333
(
cc’d via certified letter)

Los Angeles Press Club
Chris Woodyard
Board Member
4773 Hollywood Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90027-5333
(
cc’d via certified letter)

ICTM
Ronald Gots
Professional Defense Witness
2301 Research Boulevard Suite #210
Rockville, MD 20850-3204
(
cc’d via certified letter)

EM Lab & PK
Harriet Burge
Professional Defense Witness
CALIFORNIA – San Bruno
1150 Bayhill Drive, Suite 100
San Bruno CA 94066
(
email)

Paul R. Lees-Haley
Professional Defense Witness
Panorama Drive,
Huntsville, Alabama 35801
(
email)

Bryan Hardin
NIOSH (retired)
Hilton Head, SC
(
cc’d via certified letter)
(
email)

Deceptive Mantra: “Trial Lawyers, Media Hype & Junk Science”

US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform & Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy from “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” commonly referred to within the Chamber as

“views for dues”

The question is: Whose views for which dues?

From: SNK1955@aol.com
To: mary.macdonald@ucop.edu, lissa.ly@ucop.edu, SNK1955@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:44:47 EDT
Subject: Regents of UC need to act immediately~U R complicit~interstate insurance fraud.

Office of the General Counsel of the Regents of the UC, Ms. Mary MacDonald.
Office of the Chief of Staff of the Regents of the UC, Ms. Dianne Griffiths

Dear Ms. MacDonald and Ms. Griffiths (via email to Ms. Ly),

Please, you have got to do something!  Lives are at stake here, while the Regents of the UC remain silent of a fraud in health marketing  by the US Chamber of Commerce; the self professed gurus of tort reform – Manhattan Institute; the political action committee – National Apartment Association, and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY.

I received a copy of the July 27th Appellate ruling from the Abad case in Arizona regarding deceased infants and a documented moldy apartment – lots of pictures. The Az Appellate Panel completely ignored the irrefutable evidence of the fraud within the NAA PAC Amicus that cites to the US Chamber fraud in health marketing which claims it is scientifically proven all illness from mold are in reality only a result of “trial lawyers, media and junk science”  while carrying the name “University of California”.

They defined what constitutes “Outrageous! behavior” on page 33 to the point that it would cause public outcry, and then proceeded to practice it – by ignoring the evidence of the fraud of that NAA Amicus.

As clearly and repeatedly evidenced for you and the Regents of the UC – including Governor Schwarzenegger and UC President Yudof – the Chamber’s “Scientific View” of environmental science as cited within the NAA amicus, (that was a paid for hire endeavor by the Manhattan Institute “gurus of tort reform”), falsely carries the name “University of California” according to under oath statements of retired UCLA physician, Andrew Saxon – listed US Chamber author.

To reiterate the evidence of the deceit and harm by the UC’s failure to act when informed of this matter:The US Chamber medico-legal fraud in health marketing that carries the University of California name used to bias the courts:

1. Was a paid for hire endeavor.

2. The contract for its authorship was only between the Corp of GlobalTox (now VeriTox) and the Manhattan Institute think-tank (self professed “gurus of tort reform”)

3. Nowhere is UC name or the UC physician, Andrew Saxon MD, who purportedly co-authored, found anywhere within the paper – except as being listed as an author.

4. No hours were billed in the creation of the Chamber paper, for anyone conferring with Saxon, the UC physician.

5. Saxon claims under oath he had no knowledge he was named as authoring the US Chamber publication and had not even read it as late as 3 years after its publication.

6. One Veritox owner, Kelman, has stated under oath that they were hired by the Manhattan Institute to write something for judges.

7. Another Veritox owner, Hardin, has stated under oath that the Chamber paper he co-authored with Kelman was a lobbying piece.

8. UC listed author, Saxon, was not paid, like Hardin and Kelman to author this fraud in health marketing.

9. No one claims authorship of the US Chamber publication on their CVs.

10. Saxon is the only physician and only non-Veritox owner listed as a purported co- author of the US Chamber paper– that falsely carries his and thus the UC name and bias the courts by lending false credibility to the US Chamber’s “environmental science”.

11. The Regents of the UC will take no action to have the UC name removed from the Chamber paper that is used to instill bias in the courts.

12. Neither will Saxon. He can’t without exposing his ACOEM mold statement co-authors, Hardin and Kelman, for putting his and the UC name of the US Chamber marketing piece, without his knowledge.

13. The University of California has generated much income via expert defense witness fees paid to the Regents when Saxon and other UC physicians use the Chamber et al’s, fraud in health marketing to bias the courts against injured workers and others.

14. ACOEM writes the workers comp guidelines that physicians in the State of California must follow under the guise of “Workers Comp “Reform”.

Please, Ms. MacDonald and Ms. Griffiths jump in here and do something to stop this. It is interstate insurance fraud to promote or remain silent of the “environmental science” of the US Chamber of Commerce in the courts. It is adverse to the health and safety of the American public.  Tell the Chamber to take the UC name off of their “Scientific View”.  Inform the Az Appellate Court of their egregious error.

Thank you,
Sharon Kramer

Dear Mr. Scheuer and Mr. Clark,

If there is anything you can document that I have stated incorrectly in the above blog, will you please let me know so I may correct it, if need be? Also, Mr. Clark, could you be so kind to forward this email to John McDermott of NAA for me so he too may peruse the above blog and comment for error if need be? I can’t seem to locate his email address.

Thank you,
Sharon Kramer

This entry was posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Politics, Riverstone Residential, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to ARIZONA APPELLATE COURT DEFINES “OUTRAGEOUS! BEHAVIOR” AND THEN PROCEEDS TO PRACTICE IT, JUST LIKE THE SAN DIEGO COURTS HAVE FOR FIVE YEARS OVER THE SAME ISSUES – Fraud In Health Marketing By the US Chamber of Commerce et al. Submitting Known False Legal Documents By Licensed Attorneys

  1. Deborah Daniels says:

    The more things change, the more they remain the same. It is like playing wak-a-mole.

    It should be obvious by now that the conflicts of interest involve so many people at each level of this; medical, legal, media, judicial, contractors, investors, and insurance companies.

    What the AZ court did, or rather failed to do, IS OUTRAGEOUS. But, our judicial system in the US is becoming as antiquated as the British judiciary system of the 1700’s. Their message is quite clear; it is us against them and if you aren’t with us, you are against us therefore one of “them”.

    How sad for us all, yet another blow to the integrity of the judicial system and the morals of this country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s