ToxLaw Post: Pain Management Doctors Threaten ACOEM with Class Action – Experts Predict Harm to Patients – “We’re talking class action. We see this as pandering to the insurance companies,”…

Posted on ToxLaw.com by Sharon Kramer on 1/28/11

Experts Predict Harm to Patients

“Timothy Deer, MD, president of the Center for Pain Relief in Charleston, W.Va., and chair of the American Society of Anesthesiologists pain committee, said that if adopted in their current form, the ACOEM guidelines would adversely affect patients.

“We’ve gone to general quarters on this,” one society official told Pain Medicine News. “We’re talking litigation. We’re talking class action. We see this as pandering to the insurance companies,” said the clinician, who did not want to be identified. “The insurance companies will buy these guidelines and then cut and paste [the text] on their denials.”

“We don’t want this to be the de facto standard of care nationwide,” said B. Todd Sitzman, MD, MPH, president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM).

ACOEM itself has come under recent scrutiny for its ties to business. The 5,000-member group, once called the Industrial Medical Association, was the subject of a January 2007 article in The Wall Street Journal that questioned the objectivity of an ACOEM report rejecting a link between mold and serious worker illness. The authors of the report, according to the newspaper, were researchers who frequently receive money to testify for companies named in mold suits—a fact not disclosed in the report or by ACOEM.

Similar accusations were raised in a recent article in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health (2007;13:404-426), which labeled ACOEM “a professional association in service to industry” and said that corporate “money and influence permeate every aspect of occupational and environmental medicine.”

Proposed Guidelines for Workers’ Comp Patients Roil Pain Specialists

The nation’s pain groups have taken aim at proposed guidelines for the treatment of chronic pain that discount the utility of several staple interventional and noninterventional therapies, such as certain medications, epidural injections and spinal cord stimulation.

If approved, the guidelines, from the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM), could affect the willingness of health insurers to pay for the procedures in question, experts said. In the rationale sections of its recommendations, the document frequently comments on the cost-effectiveness of a given therapy. Although interventional pain medicine is a relatively new field, the growth of these procedures has been strong. Medicare spent roughly $2 billion in 2005 on interventional remedies.”

Experts Predict Harm to Patients

The authors have responded to directly to ACOEM and have made their more detailed comments available through the Neuromodulation Therapy Access Coalition’s Web site: neuromodulationaccess.org

ToxLaw.com

Oh Boy! ACOEM seems to be at it again! Wonder if the US Chamber and the Manhattan Institute think-tank are going to pay their revisers of their Mold Illness Policy to write a “lay translation” for judges just like last time? Wonder if they used expert defense witnesses from Big Tobacco to write this one, too?

Request for Transparency & Oversight of Federal Funds Used to Educate US Pediatricians of Children’s Illnesses Caused by Water Damaged Buildings (“WDB”)

ACOEM NEW YEARS RESOLUTION TO CHANGE MOLD POSITION STATEMENT

WorkCompCentral: Scientists, Physicians, Attorneys & Citizens Lodge Concern Regarding ACOEM 2010 Mold Statement Revisions Being A Continued Aid For Workers Comp Insurer Fraud Over Mold Issue. Request Transparency and Government Oversight Of ACOEM Peer Review Process

Citizens, Taxpayers and Concerned Scientists Urge Transparency In Workers’ Comp Medical Association Guidelines Used To Determine Environmentally Injured Worker’s Comp Insurer Benefits & Request Government Oversight To Curtail Insurer Cost Shifting Onto Taxpayer Funded Disability Programs For Work Related Injuries

This entry was posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Politics, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s