To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: 5/23/2014 2:18:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Lisa Schall interview, misstatement of facts
Dear Mr. Slater,
I am writing to inform you that Judge Lisa Schall made key misstatements of fact on your program yesterday.
 May 22, 2014 Slater interview of Judge Lisa Schall http://www.760kfmb.com/story/13781695/mike-slater-show-760kfmb
At 9 minutes, 36 seconds, she stated, “I always disclose to parties my history in case they are unaware of it. Because they may not choose to appear for me. I have to tell you everybody I have disclosed to has elected me to hear her case” This is false and I can personally attest that her lack of disclosure has adversely impacted litigation outcome.
In August of 2008, she oversaw a trial in which I was accused of libel over the words “altered his under oath statements” in a 2005 writing of mine — exposing a massive fraud in U.S. public health policy and U.S. courts. The plaintiffs from the case are expert defense witnesses in toxic torts, who influence U.S. public health policy.
They were paid by a think-tank to author questionable environmental policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; and they serve as toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the USDOJ. See the linked 2007 Wall Street Journal article regarding them and their courtroom science for a greater understanding of what the libel suit was really all about. Their company was called GlobalTox, Inc. It is now known as Veritox, Inc.
 March 9, 2005 writing http://freepdfhosting.com/466dff3403.pdf
 Jan 2007 WSJ article http://freepdfhosting.com/a9fa3f628e.pdf
Judge Schall came into the libel case as the trial judge just days before August 2008 trial.* The prior judge had suddenly retired. At no time did she inform us of her record of past admonishments or of her then upcoming public admonishment from the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP), September 2008. (See fn 4 attached, establishing that she misstated fact on your program yesterday about always disclosing her admonishments to parties. She did no such thing in our case).
 Aug 18, 2008 Trial transcript of first day I met Judge Schall. No mention of Schall’s offenses or admonishments. File is to big to upload. Its attached.
 Sept 5, 2008 Schall CJP Admonishment http://cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/Public_Admon/Guy-Schall_09-05-08.pdf
Had she informed us, we would have had the opportunity to request a different trial judge. We would have requested one had we known that this was a judge under stress of impending public admonishment for ethics violations. Judges are rarely publicly admonished.
Additionally, because this was her third CJP admonishment, it also came to public light that she had been privately admonished in 199 for giving custody of a child to the child’s sexual abuser. I learned of her ethics violations after the trial by reading of them in the newspaper. Prior to the drunk driving admonishment being made public; the child custody admonishment was also not publicly known.
 1993 Child sexual abuser custody case for which she was admonished: http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/re-kieshia-e-31525
 Sept 15, 2008 MetNews http://www.metnews.com/articles/2008/guys091708.htm
Lisa Schall is widely recognized as an inept (at best) judge among those who have come before her. There are several complaints against her for which she has never been admonished.
 Jan 2010 Angie’s media “Why is Judge Schall still on the bench?” http://freepdfhosting.com/a9fa3f628e.pdf
 2011 CJP claiming they were reviewing more complaints against Schall: http://angiemedia.com/2011/11/09/cjp-investigation-of-judge-lisa-schall-heats-up-citizen-input-sought/
In my matter, a juror submitted an affidavit after trial, stating (false) hearsay documents somehow got past her clerk, into the jury room, and caused a verdict for the plaintiff Bruce Kelman – based on hearsay for something I never even said.
In post trial motions, Judge Schall refused to even hear oral argument for a new trial. She then threatened me with another defamation lawsuit if I told of what occurred in her court. To my recollection, she cut me off over thirty times in oral arguments.
 Oct 2008 Declaration of Juror Shelby Stutz http://freepdfhosting.com/da12d7c1a9.pdf
 Dec 2008 Schall refused to hear oral argument for a new trial http://freepdfhosting.com/60fc2386cc.pdf
 Dec 2008 Schall threatened me with defamation if I told what occurred in her court. http://freepdfhosting.com/c2adbde015.pdf
Although I did not raise my voice, I understand why the woman who she had incarcerated [in 1999] probably lost it from not being able to get a word in edgewise. Another key misstatement of fact on your program yesterday, according to the CJP record Judge Schall did indeed sentence the woman to five days in jail and held her in contempt when the woman refused to re-enter Schall’s courtroom. To quote from the official CJP record:
“In Ms. Slivka’s absence, without citing her for contempt or having her returned to the courtroom, Judge Guy-Schall found her in contempt and sentenced her to five days in jail. The order issued by Judge Guy-Schall stated that Ms. Slivka was in direct contempt and was to serve five actual days in jail. With respect to the facts underlying the finding of contempt, the order stated, “full order and findings are set forth in the reporter’s transcript that is order [sic] this date.” Ms. Slivka was taken into custody outside the courtroom and remained in custody for five days.”
 Oct 1999 Public admonishment of Schall http://www.cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/Public_Admon/Guy-Schall_99.pdf
[In the KFMB interview, Judge Schall explained the above to Mr. Slater that she did not have Ms. Slivka jailed for five days. Instead, it was stated by Judge Schall that Ms. Slivka was taken to a county mental health facility. No explanation was given as to why the CJP would issue a public admonishment if this were the case or the correct judicial action to take. The CJP does not issue public admonishments of jurists based on frivilous allegations or justifible acts. The “procedural error” Judge Schall describes is that an officer of the court (judge) cannot issue an order that a U.S. citizen is in direct contempt of court, if they are not even in the courtroom — let alone that they should be immediately falsely imprisoned by whim of a judge. One can listen to Judge Schall’s self-justification, which contradicts the official CJP record, beginning at 9 minutes and 55 seconds of the KFMB interview]
I was her last victim on her last day, December 12, 2008, before she was moved from civil court to family court. I suspect her “volunteering” to go from the prestige of being a civil court judge down to a family court judge directly after her third CJP admonishment, was highly encouraged by the powers that be.
Shortly thereafter, she changed her name from Guy-Schall to Schall. Were it not for so much media attention, this change would make it difficult for any litigant searching her background from public records to know of her admonishments – that I can assure you she does not disclose to all parties who come before her. (Search CJP admonishments under “Schall”, None appear. They are under “Guy-Schall”)
Schall is currently being sued for racketeering along with several of her jurists peers by the California Coalition for Families and Children, for her actions in Family court. I, too, am soon to file a federal lawsuit for racketeering of Schall, et.al. She falsified the judgment from my case, and all her judicial peers covered up for her. Falsifying court documents is a felony under Penal Code 134. The concealment by her peers of Schall’s felony, has cost me all I own for daring to expose a massive public fleecing, and refusing silence of how corruption in the San Diego courts aids it to continue, including Schall’s corruption.
 Jan 2014 CCFC RICO suit http://www.weightiermatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CCFC-Letter-to-Daphne-Hearn-Attachments.pdf
 Feb 2014 Notice to CA Chief Justice of intent to sue her for RICO with Schall, et.al. over falsified court documents, pgs 4-6 http://freepdfhosting.com/2017c80649.pdf
 Not a pretty story!!! https://katysexposure.wordpress.com/environmental-advocate-sharon-kramer-us-doj-expertscal-courts-mold-not-a-pretty-story/
From my perspective and that of many others, Judge Schall is the poster child of severe ethics problems within the California judicial branch, particularly in San Diego.  One does not acquire “the least favorable record” of all state judges by shear bad luck.
 Feb 2014 SD Free Press, “Thou Shalt Not Challenge a Sitting Judge” http://sandiegofreepress.org/2014/02/thou-shalt-not-challenge-a-sitting-judge-and-other-legal-oddities/
 March 2014 Cal Court Monitor “Judicial Election Intimidation on Display in San Diego” http://californiacourtsmonitor.com/community/judicial-election-intimidation-on-display-in-san-diego/
 May 2014 UT, http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/May/12/judge-admonished-three-times/
That Schall publicly misstated fact on your program of what she discloses to those who must come before her, and publicly misstated fact of why she was admonished in 1999; further solidifies her continued lack of honesty. The LA Times first wrote of her honesty problems in 1986, “Judge’s Credibility Lacking.”
 1986 LA Times http://articles.latimes.com/1986-09-28/local/me-9731_1_judges-credibility-lacking