Join by Webcast 2/09 as I speak againt Judge Dato’s appt to 4th/1st Appellate Court

Dear All,

San Diego Superior Court Judge William S. Dato has been nominated by CA Governor Brown to serve as a justice in the Fourth District Division One Court of Appeal (4th/1st)

Tomorrow, February 9, 2017 at 10am pst, the Commission on Judicial Appointments (COJA) is expected to confirm the nomination.


The COJA panel will be composed of California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakayue, California Attorney General Xavior Becerra, and Senior Fourth District Presiding Justice Manual Ramirez.

According to their website, the appointment hearing will be webcast at 10am pst tomorrow, at the following link: 

“On Thursday, February 9, 2017, beginning at 10:00 a.m, three 45-minute public hearings have been scheduled for the Commission on Judicial Appointments to consider recent appointments by Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. A link to the live webcast will appear on this page approximately 30-minutes before the hearing.”

I am speaking against the confirmation of Judge Dato’s nomination on the grounds of unrepentant and unpunished Honest Services Fraud by him and five current justices of the 4th/1st — Presiding Justice Judith McConnell along with Justices Patricia Berke, Richard Huffman, Joanne Irion, and Cynthia Aaron (and others in the California courts).

The gist of what I am intending to say is:

I blew a whistle on how a bogus risk assessment model (the Veritox Theory) was created by toxicologists with PhDs; and how it was mass marketed by toxic tort expert defense witnesses and others to cause discrimination of those disabled by Toxic Mold. 

Multiple officers of the California courts have spent 12 years framing me for libel with toxic tort expert defense witnesses (Veritox, Inc) and burying the evidence of fraudulent court documents to aid the discriminatory fraud to continue. Judge Dato and the 4th/1st Fraudsters are key players in the ongoing deadly scam. (Of course, I will say it more politely!)

Corroborated by direct evidence, their collusive Honest Services Fraud is causing the continued mass-discrimination of those who are disabled by biocontaminants found in water damaged buildings (aka Toxic Mold).

Their fraud upon the court is enabling the continued usage of a bogus “Veritox Theory” in US physician educational materials, insurer claims handling practices, and toxic torts all across the United States — and they know it.


1. I have a degree in marketing.  On March 9, 2005 I published a WRITING on the Internet.  It exposed how the Veritox Theory (referred to as the “GlobalTox paper” in the writing) was being mass-marketed. The writing exposed that scientifically void risk-model became current accepted science by joined-unclean-hands of a U.S. Congressman from California, a nonprofit medical association which writes governmental policies, a think-tank, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the owners of Veritox, Inc. — who are toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the federal government and many private-sector insurers.

 2. In May of 2005 the owners of Veritox, Inc. sued me for libel my accurate use of the words “altered his under oath statements” in the writing. They needed me to appear to be a liar in order to keep the scam going.

 3. For twelve years, judges in the San Diego Superior Court and justices in the 4th/1st have been aiding Veritox owners to frame me for libel for those words; and have been trying to harass me into silence. By burying the direct evidence of perjury, suborning of perjury, and fraudulent court documents to make me falsely appear to be a liar; they are enabling the Veritox Theory to continue to be used to cheat those disabled by Toxic Mold.

 4.  On April 3, 2009, Judge Dato and his clerk Lynn San Nichols, left a twice-backdated, void judgment in effect. The void judgment failed to state that a jury found I was not guilty of libeling Veritox. This act of concealing a void judgment is a violation of Code of Civil Procedure 664.5, Government Code 6200, and Penal Code 134.

 5.  In a September 2010 wordsmithed appellate opinion by Justices Benke, Huffman and Irion; they suppressed the evidence that the judgment on record falsely did not state that I prevailed over Veritox in the trial and was awarded costs (by Dato’s April 3, 2009 ruling only — not by recorded judgment). From the word-smithed 4th/1st appellate opinion leaving the void judgment in effect.

“The trial court, with a different trial judge presiding, [DATO] heard Kramer’s cost motion on April 3, 2009, and awarded her a total of $2,545.28….On this record we cannot disturb the trial court’s award of costs to Kelman….Judgment affirmed. Respondents to recover their costs of appeal.”

 6.  Shortly after the pernicious appellate opinion issued; on November 4, 2010 the president of Veritox (Bruce Kelman) and his attorney Keith Scheuer submitted the unvacated void judgment to begin a second lawsuit against me in the San Diego courts. They wanted me to be permanently enjoined from writing of the fraud upon the court in the first SLAPP suit that enables the Veritox Theory to continue to harm thousands.

7. In June of 2012, Judge Thomas Nugent (retired) obliged them to permanently enjoin me.  I ignore his void order not to write of the case-fixing because it is a coram non judice, fraud upon the court to defraud the public with Veritox, Inc. No one says a word when I continue to republish the words “altered his under oath statements” while describing the twelve years of unrepentant California judicial case-fixing over those words — on behalf of toxic tort expert defense witnesses of the federal government, Veritox, Inc.  No one ever provides (the impossible) refuting evidence of the fraud.

8. As it stands today, the 4th/1st justices will not lawfully recall and rescind their fraud concealing remittiturs so the void judgments may be lawfully vacated in lower courts. They can’t recall their remittiturs without spotlighting that they have been abusing their court to harass a whistleblower of scientific fraud (moi) with falsified court documents.

9.  As such, the retaliation by falsified court documents is ongoing and ever-mounting by increasing interest of a fraudulent lien.  In 2009, Veritox owners and their attorney, Scheuer, recorded a fraudulent abstract of judgment and fraudulent, interest-accruing lien on my property by use of the unvacated void judgment.

10.  Veritox owners currently have a lien on my property which states a false date of entry of judgment and interest accruing cost award of September 24, 2008.

11.  It is not possible that anyone involved in this fiasco believes costs were awarded on September 24, 2008 — because Scheuer did not even submit his clients’ alleged costs until October 14, 2008.

12. It is not possible that anyone involved in this fiasco believes judgment was entered on September 24, 2008 — because post trial oral arguments took place more than sixty days later on December 12, 2008. If the fake lien was a legitimate legal document it would have been a violation of CCP 663(b) for post trial oral arguments to be heard on 12/12/08.

 13. Regardless of the mountain of direct evidence of fraudulent court documents, no less than ten times since September of 2010 the 4th/1st justices have obstructed the vacating of the void judgment and the removal of Veritox’s fraudulent, backdated lien from my property.  The latest date of their refusal to recall their fraud-concealing remittitur in writing came on November 10, 2015. To quote:


14.  As a result of the collusive unrepentant and unpunished Honest Services Fraud (to falsely make me appear to have been found a liar by use of unvacated fraudulent court documents) the owners of Veritox, Inc. are still serving as toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the federal government.

15. The Veritox Theory is still being used by toxic tort defense attorneys and marketed by federally funded “nonprofit” medical associations such as the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) to cheat the Toxic Mold Disabled from coast to coast.

        (To the credit of the American College of Occupational and Environmental                           Medicine (ACOEM) who were exposed in my 2005 writing for marketing the bogus           Veritox Theory as legitimate science; they are no longer marketing it as the                         scientific understanding of their 7000  occupational physician members.  See                     March 9, 2015 WorkCompCentral article) To quote:

                   “She [Kramer] said it was a litigation defense argument right from the get go.”

16. On February 2, 2017, the Chief Justice, Attorney General, Governor Brown, Justice Ramirez and Judge Dato were provided with the the direct evidence which corroborates the above statements of unrepentant and unpunished concealment of fraudulent court documents while case-fixing SLAPP over a matter impacting public health (by Judge Dato and the 4th/1st justices,

17. They all know that all it would take to shut down the Veritox’s science fraud and stop the criminal harassment of me, would be for Justice McConnell and Justice Benke to lawfully recall their remittiturs and direct the lower courts to vacate the void judgments.  This could be done at any time and even upon the 4th/1st’s own motion:

“a remittitur may be recalled on the reviewing court’s own motion, on motion or petition after notice supported by affidavits, or on stipulation setting forth the facts which will justify the granting of the order is now determined by rule. (Rule 25(d), Rules on Appeal; 36 Cal.2d at p. 22.)… Other than for the correction of clerical errors, the recall may be ordered on the ground of fraud, mistake or inadvertence.”

18. They won’t recall it.  As such and needless to say, it would not be in the public’s best interest to have Judge Dato rewarded for Honest Services Fraud by an appointment to the appellate court where his fellow justices are continuing to obstruct the vacating of a void judgment that he was instrumental in creating — to defraud the public with scientific fraud.

 19. Yet, even with the undeniable evidence of collusive wrong-doing, I am highly anticipating that the Chief Justice of California, the California Attorney General, and Justice Ramirez will, at best, thank me for sharing — and then continue on with the appointment of Judge Dato to the 4th/1st like emperors with new robes.

SO PLEASE TUNE IN TO THE WEBCAST TOMORROW if you are able.  For good cause, these people scare me by viewing themselves to be above the law.

 I have already been jailed once (2012 by Judge Thomas Nugent) and caused bodily harm for my refusal of silence of the unrepentant case-fixing to defraud the public with the scientifically void Veritox Theory; and for my refusal to sign a false confession of being guilty of libeling Veritox, Inc. owners.

To quote from the court transcript of March 14, 2012 when Judge Nugent had me brought before him in shackles and prison garb; and tried to coerce/scare me again into signing the false confession:




Although I am scared, I am not shutting up until the void judgments are vacated and Veritox’s fraudulent liens are court-order removed from my property. 

People who have been injured by Toxic Mold are still being so horribly discriminated against that some commit suicide. This is directly because of the unrepentant and unpunished SLAPP fixing in the San Diego courts to cause the mass discrimination — including by the joined unclean hands of Governor Brown’s nomination to the 4th/1st, Judge William S. Dato, and five justices who are already in the 4th/1st.

The more eyes watching tomorrow, the safer I will feel!

Thank you,

Sharon Noonan Kramer

P.S. If you are in the Sacramento area tomorrow, please turn out at 9am to support our friends at the Center for Judicial Excellence.  They are speaking before the CA Board of Psychology on the subject of how bogus expert opinions by those with PhDs are used to harm many families in California’s family courts.  See directions in THIS LINK.

Posted in Civil Justice, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Concerns of Gov Brown’s Nomination of Judge Dato to 4th/1st Appellate Court

Governor Jerry Brown has nominated Judge William S. Dato to serve as a justice in the California Fourth District Court of Appeal (4th/1st). I happen to know that this appointment would not promote autonomy and integrity in the California courts.

Judge Dato played a key role in the creation of the void judgment and fraudulent lien that is on my property — for my daring to expose how the United States government, state governments and NGO partners market naysaying science fraud to discriminate against the Toxic Mold Disabled.

4th/1st Presiding Justice Judith McConnell and Justice Patricia Benke are obstructing the vacating of the void judgment and the removal of the fraudulent lien that Dato helped to create.b9a73dcc-b13f-42c2-a1b6-cd35cd48db9d

They can’t allow the fraudulent legal documents to be vacated/removed without spotlighting that multiple San Diego jurists have been harassing me for years with falsified court documents on behalf of plaintiffs to fixed Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP).

The plaintiffs, who are the beneficiaries and participants in the now twelve years of fixed-SLAPP, are Bruce Kelman and Veritox, Inc. They are also Toxic Mold expert defense witnesses for the United States government. They are hired by toxic tort defense attorneys of the US Dept of Justice.  They also serve as experts for states, counties, and cities sued for causing environmental disabilities and deaths.

The fixed-SLAPP is over my 2005 writing exposing that Veritox’s expert testimonies are based on widely marketed garbage science — a bogus risk model, the Veritox Theory.  It’s nothing but a tool to cheat people who are disabled from Toxic Mold.

The 4th/1st justices’ obstruction of the vacating of falsified court documents in fixed-SLAPP, is the lynch-pin to the entire scam.  The acts of refusal to lawfully correct court records in SLAPP conceals that criminal means have been used by DOJ’s Toxic Mold expert witnesses to conceal that their testimonies are based on science fraud.

The 4th/1st justices’ refusals-to-act to correct the SLAPP records are also the lynch-pin-acts which conceal that crimes have been committed by California judiciary to aid the science fraud of Veritox to continue in mold litigations from coast to coast.

 So today, I filed a request to Governor Brown to withdraw his nomination of Judge Dato to serve as justice in the 4th/1st Court of Appeal.

 I also filed an extensive objection with the Commission on Judicial Appointment giving reason why they should not appoint Judge Dato to the 4th/1st.

And I filed a request to speak against the appoint of Judge Dato at the Commission hearing which takes place in the 4th/1st Appellate Court in San Diego on February 9th.

One may read the three documents at my blog “Veritox means Truth-Poison

Some highlights:

 To Brown:

“In 2011, you assumed the offices of California Governor and President of the University of California (UC) Regents. Since that time I have been providing your offices with evidence of the relentless case-fixing of a Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) in your courts. The unrepentant SLAPP fixing is causing heinous discrimination and sometimes deaths of the Toxic Mold Disabled (TMD) by enabling institutionalized, discriminatory, scientific fraud.

I have been seeking your help to stop the unrepentant-SLAPP-fixing’s enabling of the continued-marketing-and-usages of a deadly bogus risk assessment model (the Veritox Theory4) in policies, courts, claims handling practices, and physician educational materials (including at the UC, the California Department of Health, and the California Industrial Relations Board).

I have been seeking your help to stop the relentless and criminal retaliation of me under the color of law in your courts, for my daring to expose that the Veritox Theory is nothing more than a paid-for-hire mass-marketed scientific-fraud being promoted as legitimate science. (See extensive files in the Governor’s office and UC Regents’ office.)…..

Additionally, your newest appointee to the San Diego Superior Court, Judge Laura Duffy, refused on multiple occasions to prosecute the SLAPP-fixing jurists, the DOJ’s hired guns at VERITOX, and their attorney SCHEUER when she was serving as the DOJ Federal Attorney in the Southern District of California.

 This means there are CA appellate justices who will be reviewing decisions of a CA judge who knows of the justices and her new-judicial-peers collusively committing unpunished criminal acts, which the new judge enabled to continue. The case-fixing jurists in turn know that they have reason to be beholden to the newest judge for not jailing them for a massive collusive crime to defraud the public. The potential for collusive case fixing, cronyism, or peer pressure to commit judicial misconduct in future San Diego County cases is glaringly obvious…

So for six years, Governor Brown, your office-staff have been telling me that you do not have the capability to thwart deadly cronyism in the California courts. But today, I know that is not the case.

Please act today on behalf of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens and workers of California and the United States; and on behalf of assuring integrity and autonomy to our courts.

Please rescind your nomination of William S. DATO to serve as a justice in the 4th/1st with his equally compromised judicial peers of Justices Judith McConnell, Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman, Cynthia Aaron, and Joanne Irion.

Instead of placing your new Attorney General Xavior Becerra in a compromised position by asking him to appoint Judge DATO to the 4th/1st in the interest of justice; could you please instead in the interest of justice, ask AG Becerra to prosecute Judge DATO and over half of the justices of the 4th/1st?

The direct evidence is undeniable. They are criminally involved in twelve years of unrepentant SLAPP-fixing to defraud the citizens of California and the United States. To date, no one will punish them.”

To the Commission on Judicial Appointment:


“There are a severe ethics problem in the California courts which caused the need for the audit of the Judicial Council, the audit of the State Bar, and the upcoming-audit of the Commission on Judicial Performance.

For good cause as shown above, I believe that Judge Dato may have fallen prey to the erred mindset that, above all else, he is to protect his fellow jurists instead of protecting the Constitutional rights of litigants in California’s courts. The erred Speak With One Voice mindset among California jurists and favored attorneys is literally killing people as this matter proves.

All it would take to save thousands of lives from the continued usage of the bogus Veritox Theory, is for 4th/1st Justices McConnell and Benke to recall their fraud-concealing remittiturs and direct lower courts to order the removal of fraudulent liens based on void judgments that Judge Dato helped to create.

The fact that they will not lawfully cause the vacating of void SLAPP-documents & the removal of fraudulent liens from property; and find it appropriate that Judge Dato should join them in the 4th/1st by nomination of the Governor and appointment by the Attorney General & Chief Justice; is a testament to how compromised California’s courts have been allowed to become with little to no oversight.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.”

Sharon Kramer

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sacramento News & Review RE: Systemic ethics problems in California’s courts

Joseph Sweeney is a diligent court reformer who is seeking appointment to the California Commission on Judicial Performance. (Joe for CJP)  CJP is the state agency which is to oversee ethics in the California courts.  For good cause, they are currently being audited by the state auditor.

With regard to the article “California’s family court system places kids back in the hands of alleged abusers Profiteering judges, lax oversight and sexism have set up a cottage industry that works against poor parents” by Alastair Bland, Mr. Sweeney writes, 

“Tremendous cover article by Alastair Bland in Sacramento News & Review. Quoted are a defecting former San Diego County family judge, very prominent attorneys, Berkeley and Cal State professors, and leaders of activist organizations, including myself. Stories of mothers and a father trying to get their kids back. Study showed that in 98% of the cases in which children were taken from the mother, the father had an attorney and the mother did not. If a study were done of the reverse situation, I have little doubt the result would have been reversed, too. This is not a men v. women issue, it’s a justice issue. Great work to all my colleagues in the article.”

Mr. Sweeney is right. This is the most well written and comprehensive article that I have seen to date regarding the cesspool of cronyism, bias and conflicts of interest that the California judicial branch has become from lack of effective oversight.  To quote some highlights from Mr. Bland’s article:

“But Judge Peter McBrien—still with the court today—was convinced the boy had been coached by his mother to concoct the allegations and handed him over to his father for primary custody. The reports of abuse continued. In July 1995, the child called the police himself, asking for protection from his dad.

According to a report by the responding police officer, obtained by SN&R, the boy graphically described being sodomized. The 5-year-old told the same story to a CPS social worker and even drew an image of his father raping him before a camera on a tripod. In the crude drawing, the dad’s face is smiling while the child cries.

The boy spent some time in foster care but was eventually court-ordered back to his dad. His mother died of cancer in 1998, and his story was orphaned to obscurity.

Connie Valentine founded the California Protective Parents Association in Sacramento in 1999 in direct response to the case. Almost 20 years later, she’s still trying to reform what she says is a corrupt branch of the court system that destroys lives…”


“An East Bay group called Court Reform LLC is lobbying for several procedural changes that could benefit family court litigants unable to afford attorneys. And the Socioeconomic Justice Institute, a newly founded organization based in the Silicon Valley, is preparing to launch a class-action lawsuit against California court administrators and several judges, including Mize and McBrien.

‘An entire branch of government is operating in the dark, like the Catholic Church,’ said Kathleen Russell, executive director of the Center for Judicial Excellence, a Marin County organization that aims to protect litigants’ basic courtroom rights. ‘This has become an unregulated cottage industry that is completely unaccountable to anyone.”

“The court system is systematically trafficking children who are abused by a parent away from their safe parent who is trying to protect them and into contact with the parent they say is harming them,’ Russell said. ‘It happens almost every time like clockwork. If you raise an allegation of abuse, the system starts turning against you, even if you have legitimate medical evidence that the kid has been raped or beaten, or there is testimony from the emergency room doctors saying they see evidence of abuse.’

Linda Barnard, a licensed marriage therapist in Sacramento who regularly testifies in court as a domestic violence expert witness, describes the same recurring outcomes in cases where a woman reports abuse.

‘The more frantic the mother becomes, the more they think she’s crazy, and pretty soon the abusive parent ends up with the kid,” she said. “Many times people are actually afraid now to disclose abuse because they’re afraid they’ll lose their kids.”


“In theory, judges would stamp out systemic corruption that turned family court squabbles into money-making schemes—but they don’t, at least not always, according to DeAnn Salcido, a former family court judge in San Diego County.

In fact, Salcido says judges may actually cash in on the system by becoming private custody mediators after they retire, a service for which they can pocket $500 an hour. Since lawyers are the ones who recommend these mediators, it behooves a judge to curry favor with established family law attorneys during their time on the bench, Salcido explains.

On the other hand, ‘judges who piss attorneys off won’t be recommended,’ explained Salcido, now a family law attorney herself. This system, she says, fosters cronyism between judges and attorneys and leads to biased rulings in the family courts.

Moreover, Salcido says, the mediation service itself is a scam. She says mediators often fail to fact-check what one parent tells them, leading to badly flawed custody recommendations—which, she notes, judges follow most of the time. ‘They’re basically delegating their decision-making to the mediator’, she said

‘It’s dumbfounding,’ Salcido said. ‘Only in family court can a child who has claimed to be abused by a person be then forced to be in that person’s company.”


“Judges don’t follow the laws, but then the CJP doesn’t do anything about it,’ said Stephen James, the co-director of the Socioeconomic Justice Institute and an investigative reporter with years of experience studying California’s family courts.

Sweeney, at Court Reform LLC, was keen on learning more about the complaints—who filed them and why. He submitted a public records request with the commission last February to access this information, and the agency promptly refused to hand it over.

Shortly thereafter, the state auditor, answering to public outcry, similarly demanded access to the CJP’s records. In its 56-year history, the commission has never been audited—and the secretive 11-member unit, which filed a lawsuit on October 20, 2015, to block the audit, is trying to keep it that way.

The CJP’s director did not return multiple calls from SN&R seeking comment….”


“The tide may be turning slowly in favor of families, parents and children. The state auditor has the Commission on Judicial Performance in the hot seat. Court Reform LLC’s Sweeney is even applying to serve as one of the CJP’s six public members.

James, at the Socioeconomic Justice Institute, is working closely with Carlsson and Susan Ferris—who went four years without seeing her daughter due to a series of Sacramento court actions that James insists were illegal—on the class action lawsuit against the state, which he expects to have filed within six months.

On January 3, the Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that CPS [Child Protective Services] workers who place a child in an abusive home can be held accountable, whereas previously they have been protected by immunity.

James, a former SN&R contributor, says the decision, made in Pasadena, sets a groundbreaking precedent that could start the unraveling of immunity protections for employees of the family courts, where judges and attorneys, without transcripts to track their behavior, rarely face legal consequences for their actions.”

‘The pressure is going to start coming from the top down to the county level,” James said. ‘The family courts are going to start getting the message that they need to follow the law, stop with the cronyism and giving favorable rulings to their favorite attorneys, and stop the bias against the people who can’t afford attorneys.”

The author of this blog, Sharon Noonan Kramer, has been working to get the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) to prosecute for case-fixing Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) in the San Diego Superior Court and Appellate Court. The case-fixing, including concealment of falsified court documents, has been occurring for now twelve years. The relentless and unpunished judicial and attorney misconduct has been on behalf of the SLAPP plaintiffs who are toxic tort expert defense witnesses, Veritox, Inc.

Veritox, Inc. is frequently hired by attorneys of the USDOJ, municipalities in California and in other states to serve as toxicologist expert defense witnesses in mold litigations. The purpose of their hirings and the purpose of the unpunished SLAPP fixing are to stave off government liability for disabilities caused by poorly maintained government buildings.  As of December 2016, the USDOJ is still refusing to prosecute the “California Judiciary”.

One can see the still unvacated, falsified court documents from the California fixed-SLAPP and Veritox’s latest USDOJ contract for expert witnessing services (July 2016) at this link: DOJ, Unveil California Justices’ Obstructing the Vacating of Deadly, Backdated SLAPP Documents – Veritox means Truth-Poison


If you would like to voice your support to Governor Jerry Brown and California legislators to appoint Mr. Sweeney as a citizen member of the state’s judicial oversight committee, please see the contact information to do so, at this link: JOE for CJP.

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | 10 Comments

How 2016 Voters Can End Judicial Corruption

“The underlying issue of the 2016 election is lack of integrity, judicial corruption and its effect on each and every voter.”  Dr. Richard Fine

Daily Kos How 2016 Voters Can Restore Judicial Integrity and End Judicial Corruption

As of September 7-11, 2016 a Gallup Poll showed only 12% of those polled had a “great deal” of trust in the Judicial Branch, 37% had “none at all” or “not very much” and only 49% had a “fair amount.”

The Judicial Branch functions on the public’s perception of its integrity and freedom from corruption.

Lack of Integrity and Judicial Corruption manifest through bias, “bribery”, conflicts of interest, financial investments or transactions, undisclosed campaign contributions or loans to a judge’s judicial campaign by a party to the litigation, and other violations of law or Canons of Judicial Ethics.

The underlying issue of the 2016 election is lack of integrity, judicial corruption and its effect on each and every voter. Each party platform spoke of changing the criminal justice system, but neither attacked the cause for change, i.e. lack of judicial integrity and judicial corruption.

Sooner or later, almost all of the issues discussed in the 2016 election campaign will be before either the federal or a state Judicial Branch. Unless the Judicial Branch is perceived to possess integrity and be free of corruption, the issues and promises of the 2016 election will be meaningless.

Selecting Supreme Court nominees for political beliefs was discussed in the 2016 campaigns, but once selected, the Supreme Court justices continue to be able to avoid disqualifying themselves when a conflict of interest arises, neither the parties or the country will receive a fair hearing.

Political campaigns at the Presidential, Senate, House of Representatives, state and municipal levels ignored the underlying problem of lack of integrity and judicial corruption.

With a close election and candidates needing every vote, voters have the power to demand judicial integrity be restored and judicial corruption end.

Before November 8, 2016, voters demand by e-mail, letter, petition, telephone and at each candidate speech or gathering, each Presidential, Senate, House and state candidate pledge to introduce and support legislation to:

  1. end judicial corruption;

  2. restore judicial integrity by restricting absolute judicial immunity to be available only to the judge’s legal reasoning of the judge’s decision being appealed and removing all other functions or collateral circumstances such as malice or bias which contributed to such decision;

  3. restore judicial integrity by ending quasi judicial immunity; and

  4. restore judicial integrity by removing judges from deciding their own or other judges’ disqualification motions.

Together, voters will restore judicial integrity and end judicial corruption with the 2016 election.

Richard I. Fine, Ph.D.; Strategic Consultant and Mediator; Chmn., Campaign for Judicial Integrity; Co-Chmn., Judicial Reform Comm., DivorceCorp.”

Click HERE to add comment to the Daily Kos article.

For a greater understanding of what can happen to thousands of people’s lives when political prostitutes disguised as honorable California judges and  justices are not held accountable for case-fixing on behalf of undesirable elements within the United States government, see my latest blog on Katy’s Exposure

The Hill ~ CDC influenced by corporate & political interests 

Sharon Kramer

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Hill ~ CDC influenced by corporate & political interests

The CDC is being being influenced by corporate and political interests quote:

“Concerns about the inner workings of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been mounting in recent months amid disclosures of cozy corporate alliances. Now a group of more than a dozen senior scientists have reportedly lodged an ethics complaint alleging the federal agency is being influenced by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers.

A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or (CDC SPIDER), put a list of complaints in writing in a letter to CDC Chief of Staff and provided a copy of the letter to the public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK). The members of the group have elected to file the complaint anonymously for fear of retribution.”

This is what I have been trying to get to public light over the Toxic Mold issue for now eleven years.  The CDC is selling scientific fraud which professes to prove the biocontaminants in water damaged buildings can never reach a level to cause brain injury, disability and death.


They are doing it by a widely marketed bogus risk assessment model that was concocted in 2001 by Bryan Hardin and Bruce Kelman, the “Veritox Theory” (See link marked Exhibit 2).

Hardin is a retired Deputy Director of CDC NIOSH. Kelman is an old Tobacco Scientist. They are both prolific expert defense witnesses in Toxic Mold litigation and two of the six owners of Veritox, Inc.

I published a writing on the Internet in 2005 explaining how they were marketing the scientific fraud with “nonprofit” medical associations, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a U.S. Congressman to mislead the courts to deny liability for causation of Toxic Mold disabilities.

The California courts aided Kelman and Hardin and their corrupt California attorney, Keith Scheuer, to frame me for libel for the writing to keep the CDC backed-fraud going.

The compromised California judges put me in jail in 2012 for refusing to sign a false confession that my 2005 writing was a lie. From the March 14, 2012 court transcript:


I can’t get the USDOJ to prosecute the California judges and justices for case-fixing to aid the CDC backed-fraud without greater sunlight on the issue. See their latest refusal below.


The Gossiping Ninnies within the Mold Issue make it a thousand times harder to get the truth to light. They keep promoting that it’s not a government backed-crime that is harming everyone; and that I’m lying about the corruption in the California court when case-fixing for Kelman & Hardin is aiding the crime to continue  — while people are dying from the fraud in policy covered up by the fraud in the California courts.

That’s why I’m  Declaring War on the Toxic Mold Gossiping Ninnies

Sharon Noonan Kramer

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | 1 Comment